366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26333684)
1. Decisions by Finnish Medical Research Ethics Committees: A Nationwide Study of Process and Outcomes.
Hemminki E; Virtanen JI; Regushevskaya E
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Oct; 10(4):404-13. PubMed ID: 26333684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Research ethics committees in the regulation of clinical research: comparison of Finland to England, Canada, and the United States.
Hemminki E
Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Jan; 14():5. PubMed ID: 26865158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confidence of IRB/REC Members in Their Assessments of Human Research Risk: A Study of IRB/REC Decision Making in Action.
Grinnell F; Sadler JZ; McNamara V; Senetar K; Reisch J
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Jul; 12(3):140-149. PubMed ID: 28558484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
Angell E; Dixon-Woods M
J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 19181888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [External regulation of clinical research requires a change].
Hemminki E
Duodecim; 2015; 131(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 26233984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by research ethics committees?
Angell E; Tarrant C; Dixon-Woods M
J Clin Pathol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):825-9. PubMed ID: 19734481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomedical Research Ethics Committees in sub-Saharan Africa: a collective review of their structure, functioning, and outcomes.
Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 25819759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.
Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Varying ethics rules in clinical research and routine patient care--research ethics committee chairpersons' views in Finland.
Hemminki E; Virtanen JI; Veerus P
Health Res Policy Syst; 2014 Mar; 12():15. PubMed ID: 24666735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical regulation of biomedical research in Brazil: a quality improvement initiative.
de Castro DRP; Castillo CHM; Ferreira JPD; Oliveira JPA; Kirsten TF; de França PHC; Zavalhia LS; Notti RK; Kochhann R; Amantéa SL
BMC Med Ethics; 2024 Jun; 25(1):68. PubMed ID: 38858731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Case-Study of the Resources and Functioning of Two Research Ethics Committees in Western India.
Chenneville T; Menezes L; Kosambiya J; Baxi R
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Dec; 11(5):387-396. PubMed ID: 26994735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding institutional review boards: practical guidance to the IRB review process.
Pech C; Cob N; Cejka JT
Nutr Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 22(6):618-28. PubMed ID: 18042949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Written work: the social functions of Research Ethics Committee letters.
Dixon-Woods M; Angell E; Ashcroft RE; Bryman A
Soc Sci Med; 2007 Aug; 65(4):792-802. PubMed ID: 17490795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined.
Angell EL; Bryman A; Ashcroft RE; Dixon-Woods M
Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Apr; 17(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18385408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are Research Ethics Committees Prepared for Community-Based Participatory Research?
Tamariz L; Medina H; Taylor J; Carrasquillo O; Kobetz E; Palacio A
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 26527370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Doing accountability: a discourse analysis of research ethics committee letters.
O'Reilly M; Dixon-Woods M; Angell E; Ashcroft R; Bryman A
Sociol Health Illn; 2009 Mar; 31(2):246-61. PubMed ID: 18983419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project.
Dixon-Woods M; Foy C; Hayden C; Al-Shahi Salman R; Tebbutt S; Schroter S
BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011973. PubMed ID: 27580832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Medical research ethics committees in the Federal Republic of Germany: establishment and integration into medical research].
Doppelfeld E; Hasford J
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2019 Jun; 62(6):682-689. PubMed ID: 31049626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Differentiated review of biomedical research projects by ethics committees].
Portales MB; Michaud P; Salas SP; Beca JP
Rev Med Chil; 2017 Mar; 145(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 28548197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
