These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26333684)

  • 21. Consistency in decision making by research ethics committees: a controlled comparison.
    Angell E; Sutton AJ; Windridge K; Dixon-Woods M
    J Med Ethics; 2006 Nov; 32(11):662-4. PubMed ID: 17074825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Status of healthcare studies submitted to UK research ethics committees for approval in 2004-5.
    Arshad A; Arkwright PD
    J Med Ethics; 2008 May; 34(5):393-5. PubMed ID: 18448724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ethical review from the inside: repertoires of evaluation in Research Ethics Committee meetings.
    de Jong JP; van Zwieten MC; Willems DL
    Sociol Health Illn; 2012 Sep; 34(7):1039-52. PubMed ID: 22332841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.
    Ballantyne A; Moore A
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 30407144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can we do better? Researchers' experiences with ethical review boards on projects with later life as a focus.
    Pachana NA; Liddle J; Peel NM; Beattie E; Juang C; Knight BG
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2015; 43(3):701-7. PubMed ID: 25374104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Description and Evaluation of the Research Ethics Review Process in Japan: Proposed Measures for Improvement.
    Suzuki M; Sato K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):256-66. PubMed ID: 27534589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Ethics approval for a research study (2).
    Mallia P
    Early Hum Dev; 2018 Sep; 124():49-51. PubMed ID: 29731261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises?
    Emanuel EJ; Lemmens T; Elliot C
    PLoS Med; 2006 Jul; 3(7):e309. PubMed ID: 16848618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Legislative regulation and ethical governance of medical research in different European Union countries.
    Veerus P; Lexchin J; Hemminki E
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Jun; 40(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 23665856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using the Emanuel et al. framework to assess ethical issues raised by a biomedical research ethics committee in South Africa.
    Tsoka-Gwegweni JM; Wassenaar DR
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):36-45. PubMed ID: 25747689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Law, ethics and research ethics committees.
    Beyleveld D
    Med Law; 2002; 21(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 12017445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ranking Research Methodology by Risk - a cross-sectional study to determine the opinion of research ethics committee members.
    Kolstoe SE; Durning J; Yost J; Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S
    Syst Rev; 2023 Sep; 12(1):154. PubMed ID: 37658420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Drug development: assessment of pharmacogenetic studies by Spanish research ethics committees.
    Dal-Ré R; Luque I; Torres R; Lahuerta J
    Pharmacogenomics J; 2009 Apr; 9(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 19079365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Real-Time IRB: A Collaborative Innovation to Decrease IRB Review Time.
    Spellecy R; Eve AM; Connors ER; Shaker R; Clark DC
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Oct; 13(4):432-437. PubMed ID: 29902956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Payment of research participants: current practice and policies of Irish research ethics committees.
    Roche E; King R; Mohan HM; Gavin B; McNicholas F
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Sep; 39(9):591-3. PubMed ID: 23204324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Responsibility and function of Research Ethics Committees].
    Doppelfeld E
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2009 Apr; 52(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 19263025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of Regulatory Support Services on Institutional Review Board Turnaround Times.
    Desai P; Nasa P; Soo J; Jia C; Berbaum ML; Fischer JH; Johnson TP
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Jul; 12(3):131-139. PubMed ID: 28412874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics.
    Garrard E; Dawson A
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Jul; 31(7):419-23. PubMed ID: 15994364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries.
    Silverman H; Sleem H; Moodley K; Kumar N; Naidoo S; Subramanian T; Jaafar R; Moni M
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Apr; 41(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 24748650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.