These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
15. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation. Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing. Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of hearing preservation outcomes in routine cochlear implant care: Implications for candidacy. Verschuur C; Hellier W; Teo C Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():62-5. PubMed ID: 27099115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients. Tejani VD; Kim JS; Etler CP; Skidmore J; Yuan Y; He S; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1014-1028. PubMed ID: 36790447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of low-frequency hearing. Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acceptance and Benefits of Electro-Acoustic Stimulation for Conventional-Length Electrode Arrays. Spitzer ER; Waltzman SB; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 32721977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]