These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26334680)

  • 1. Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy among Women Screened in the Ontario Breast Screening Program.
    Prummel MV; Muradali D; Shumak R; Majpruz V; Brown P; Jiang H; Done SJ; Yaffe MJ; Chiarelli AM
    Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):365-73. PubMed ID: 26334680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital compared with screen-film mammography: performance measures in concurrent cohorts within an organized breast screening program.
    Chiarelli AM; Edwards SA; Prummel MV; Muradali D; Majpruz V; Done SJ; Brown P; Shumak RS; Yaffe MJ
    Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):684-93. PubMed ID: 23674784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast cancer: missed interval and screening-detected cancer at full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography-- results from a retrospective review.
    Hoff SR; Abrahamsen AL; Samset JH; Vigeland E; Klepp O; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):378-86. PubMed ID: 22700555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study.
    Skaane P; Hofvind S; Skjennald A
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):708-17. PubMed ID: 17709826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital compared to screen-film mammography: breast cancer prognostic features in an organized screening program.
    Prummel MV; Done SJ; Muradali D; Majpruz V; Brown P; Jiang H; Shumak RS; Yaffe MJ; Holloway CM; Chiarelli AM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Sep; 147(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 25108740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
    Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammographic performance in a population-based screening program: before, during, and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital mammography.
    Hofvind S; Skaane P; Elmore JG; Sebuødegård S; Hoff SR; Lee CI
    Radiology; 2014 Jul; 272(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 24689858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection.
    Sala M; Comas M; Macià F; Martinez J; Casamitjana M; Castells X
    Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 19420316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammographic findings of women recalled for diagnostic work-up in digital versus screen-film mammography in a population-based screening program.
    Lipasti S; Anttila A; Pamilo M
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Jun; 51(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 20429762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital versus screen-film mammography: impact of mammographic density and hormone therapy on breast cancer detection.
    Chiarelli AM; Prummel MV; Muradali D; Shumak RS; Majpruz V; Brown P; Jiang H; Done SJ; Yaffe MJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Nov; 154(2):377-87. PubMed ID: 26518019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data.
    Vinnicombe S; Pinto Pereira SM; McCormack VA; Shiel S; Perry N; Dos Santos Silva IM
    Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):347-58. PubMed ID: 19401569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts.
    Del Turco MR; Mantellini P; Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Martinelli F; Lazzari B; Houssami N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):860-6. PubMed ID: 17885057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study.
    Skaane P; Skjennald A
    Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 15155893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study.
    Bluekens AM; Holland R; Karssemeijer N; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ
    Radiology; 2012 Dec; 265(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 23033499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program.
    Séradour B; Heid P; Estève J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 24370149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection Rate, Recall Rate, and Positive Predictive Value of Digital Compared to Screen-Film Mammography in the Quebec Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Théberge I; Vandal N; Langlois A; Pelletier É; Brisson J
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2016 Nov; 67(4):330-338. PubMed ID: 27451910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program.
    Heddson B; Rönnow K; Olsson M; Miller D
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 17383841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations.
    Lewin JM; Hendrick RE; D'Orsi CJ; Isaacs PK; Moss LJ; Karellas A; Sisney GA; Kuni CC; Cutter GR
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):873-80. PubMed ID: 11230669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens.
    van Luijt PA; Fracheboud J; Heijnsdijk EA; den Heeten GJ; de Koning HJ;
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Nov; 49(16):3517-25. PubMed ID: 23871248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.
    Hambly NM; McNicholas MM; Phelan N; Hargaden GC; O'Doherty A; Flanagan FL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1010-8. PubMed ID: 19770323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.