These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26335207)

  • 1. How to estimate how well people estimate: evaluating measures of individual differences in the approximate number system.
    Chesney D; Bjalkebring P; Peters E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2781-802. PubMed ID: 26335207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task Constraints Affect Mapping From Approximate Number System Estimates to Symbolic Numbers.
    Chesney DL; Matthews PG
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1801. PubMed ID: 30386272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonsymbolic numerical magnitude comparison: reliability and validity of different task variants and outcome measures, and their relationship to arithmetic achievement in adults.
    Price GR; Palmer D; Battista C; Ansari D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 22445770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developmental differences in approaches to nonsymbolic comparison tasks.
    Clayton S; Inglis M; Gilmore C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):436-445. PubMed ID: 29419356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability and Validity of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Comparison Tasks in School-Aged Children.
    Castro D; Estévez N; Gómez D; Dartnell PR
    Span J Psychol; 2017 Dec; 20():E75. PubMed ID: 29199626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numerical distance effect size is a poor metric of approximate number system acuity.
    Chesney D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1057-1063. PubMed ID: 29651753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indexing the approximate number system.
    Inglis M; Gilmore C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():147-55. PubMed ID: 24361686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability.
    Libertus ME; Feigenson L; Halberda J
    Dev Sci; 2011 Nov; 14(6):1292-300. PubMed ID: 22010889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual Differences in Nonsymbolic Ratio Processing Predict Symbolic Math Performance.
    Matthews PG; Lewis MR; Hubbard EM
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Feb; 27(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 26710824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dot Display Affects Approximate Number System Acuity and Relationships with Mathematical Achievement and Inhibitory Control.
    Norris JE; Castronovo J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155543. PubMed ID: 27195749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling the approximate number system to quantify the contribution of visual stimulus features.
    DeWind NK; Adams GK; Platt ML; Brannon EM
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():247-65. PubMed ID: 26056747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the Approximate Number System: no relation between numerical comparison and estimation tasks.
    Guillaume M; Gevers W; Content A
    Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):248-58. PubMed ID: 25742706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dot comparison stimuli are not all alike: the effect of different visual controls on ANS measurement.
    Clayton S; Gilmore C; Inglis M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Oct; 161():177-84. PubMed ID: 26408864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The precision of mapping between number words and the approximate number system predicts children's formal math abilities.
    Libertus ME; Odic D; Feigenson L; Halberda J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Oct; 150():207-226. PubMed ID: 27348475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acuity of the approximate number system and preschoolers' quantitative development.
    van Marle K; Chu FW; Li Y; Geary DC
    Dev Sci; 2014 Jul; 17(4):492-505. PubMed ID: 24498980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of numeracy and approximate number system acuity in predicting value and probability distortion.
    Patalano AL; Saltiel JR; Machlin L; Barth H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1820-9. PubMed ID: 26404634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explaining the relationship between number line estimation and mathematical achievement: The role of visuomotor integration and visuospatial skills.
    Simms V; Clayton S; Cragg L; Gilmore C; Johnson S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 May; 145():22-33. PubMed ID: 26773209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual nesting impacts approximate number system estimation.
    Chesney DL; Gelman R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1104-13. PubMed ID: 22810562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in the acuity of the Approximate Number System in adults: the effect of mathematical ability.
    Guillaume M; Nys J; Mussolin C; Content A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):506-12. PubMed ID: 24096088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numerical ordering ability mediates the relation between number-sense and arithmetic competence.
    Lyons IM; Beilock SL
    Cognition; 2011 Nov; 121(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 21855058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.