These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26335625)

  • 1. Direct and crossed effects of somatosensory electrical stimulation on motor learning and neuronal plasticity in humans.
    Veldman MP; Zijdewind I; Solnik S; Maffiuletti NA; Berghuis KM; Javet M; Négyesi J; Hortobágyi T
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2015 Dec; 115(12):2505-19. PubMed ID: 26335625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Somatosensory electrical stimulation improves skill acquisition, consolidation, and transfer by increasing sensorimotor activity and connectivity.
    Veldman MP; Maurits NM; Zijdewind I; Maffiuletti NA; van Middelkoop S; Mizelle JC; Hortobágyi T
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Jul; 120(1):281-290. PubMed ID: 29641307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Somatosensory Electrical Stimulation Does Not Augment Motor Skill Acquisition and Intermanual Transfer in Healthy Young Adults-A Pilot Study.
    Négyesi J; Veldman MP; Berghuis KMM; Javet M; Tihanyi J; Hortobágyi T
    Motor Control; 2018 Jan; 22(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 28338389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Whole-hand water flow stimulation increases motor cortical excitability: a study of transcranial magnetic stimulation and movement-related cortical potentials.
    Sato D; Yamashiro K; Onishi H; Yasuhiro B; Shimoyama Y; Maruyama A
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Feb; 113(3):822-33. PubMed ID: 25376780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inducing homeostatic-like plasticity in human motor cortex through converging corticocortical inputs.
    Pötter-Nerger M; Fischer S; Mastroeni C; Groppa S; Deuschl G; Volkmann J; Quartarone A; Münchau A; Siebner HR
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Dec; 102(6):3180-90. PubMed ID: 19726723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parietal transcranial direct current stimulation modulates primary motor cortex excitability.
    Rivera-Urbina GN; Batsikadze G; Molero-Chamizo A; Paulus W; Kuo MF; Nitsche MA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 41(6):845-55. PubMed ID: 25645274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective modulation of left primary motor cortex excitability after continuous theta burst stimulation to right primary motor cortex and bimanual training.
    Neva JL; Singh AM; Vesia M; Staines WR
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Aug; 269():138-46. PubMed ID: 24786332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on the excitability of corticospinal axons of the human cerebral cortex.
    Di Lazzaro V; Ranieri F; Profice P; Pilato F; Mazzone P; Capone F; Insola A; Oliviero A
    Brain Stimul; 2013 Jul; 6(4):641-3. PubMed ID: 23085442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Isometric contraction interferes with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induced plasticity: evidence of state-dependent neuromodulation in human motor cortex.
    Thirugnanasambandam N; Sparing R; Dafotakis M; Meister IG; Paulus W; Nitsche MA; Fink GR
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2011; 29(5):311-20. PubMed ID: 21697590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased motor cortical excitability after whole-hand electrical stimulation: a TMS study.
    Golaszewski SM; Bergmann J; Christova M; Nardone R; Kronbichler M; Rafolt D; Gallasch E; Staffen W; Ladurner G; Beisteiner R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 121(2):248-54. PubMed ID: 20036618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recent History of Effector Use Modulates Practice-Dependent Changes in Corticospinal Excitability but Not Motor Learning.
    Hussain SJ; Darling WG; Cole KJ
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(4):584-93. PubMed ID: 27117281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrical stimulation during skill training with a therapeutic glove enhances the induction of cortical plasticity and has a positive effect on motor memory.
    Christova M; Rafolt D; Golaszewski S; Nardone R; Gallasch E
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Aug; 270():171-8. PubMed ID: 24844752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corticomotor excitability changes seen in the resting forearm during contralateral rhythmical movement and force manipulations: a TMS study.
    Ibey RJ; Staines WR
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 257():265-74. PubMed ID: 24070855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Induction of cortical plasticity for reciprocal muscles by paired associative stimulation.
    Suzuki M; Kirimoto H; Sugawara K; Watanabe M; Shimizu S; Ishizaka I; Yamada S; Matsunaga A; Fukuda M; Onishi H
    Brain Behav; 2014; 4(6):822-32. PubMed ID: 25365805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The acute effects of motor imagery and cervical transcutaneous electrical stimulation on manual dexterity and neural excitability.
    Capozio A; Ichiyama R; Astill SL
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Aug; 187():108613. PubMed ID: 37285931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct and crossed effects of somatosensory stimulation on neuronal excitability and motor performance in humans.
    Veldman MP; Maffiuletti NA; Hallett M; Zijdewind I; Hortobágyi T
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2014 Nov; 47():22-35. PubMed ID: 25064816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of sustained excitability of the leg motor cortex after transcranial magnetic stimulation in associative plasticity.
    Roy FD; Norton JA; Gorassini MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 98(2):657-67. PubMed ID: 17537908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cortical excitability and motor task in man: an investigation of the wrist extensor motor area.
    Aimonetti JM; Nielsen JB
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 143(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 11914788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduced intracortical inhibition and facilitation of corticospinal neurons in musicians.
    Nordstrom MA; Butler SL
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jun; 144(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 12021815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The interaction with task-induced activity is more important than polarization: a tDCS study.
    Bortoletto M; Pellicciari MC; Rodella C; Miniussi C
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 25464828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.