153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26337220)
1. Effect of voxel size on accuracy of cone beam computed tomography-aided assessment of periodontal furcation involvement.
Kamburoğlu K; Ereş G; Akgün C; Yeta EN; Gülen O; Karacaoĝlu F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Nov; 120(5):644-50. PubMed ID: 26337220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An ex vivo comparison of diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in the detection of furcal perforations.
Kamburoğlu K; Yeta EN; Yılmaz F
J Endod; 2015 May; 41(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 25684431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in assessing maxillary molar furcation involvement.
Qiao J; Wang S; Duan J; Zhang Y; Qiu Y; Sun C; Liu D
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Mar; 41(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 24372315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of furcal perforations in the vicinity of different root canal sealers using a cone beam computed tomography system with and without the application of artifact reduction mode: an ex vivo investigation on extracted human teeth.
Kamburoğlu K; Yılmaz F; Yeta EN; Özen D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Jun; 121(6):657-65. PubMed ID: 27039007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of simulated incipient furcation involvement by CBCT: an in vitro study using pig mandibles.
Umetsubo OS; Gaia BF; Costa FF; Cavalcanti MG
Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 22790499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A retrospective study on molar furcation assessment via clinical detection, intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography.
Zhang W; Foss K; Wang BY
BMC Oral Health; 2018 May; 18(1):75. PubMed ID: 29724208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of periodontal defects: an in vitro study.
Bagis N; Kolsuz ME; Kursun S; Orhan K
BMC Oral Health; 2015 May; 15():64. PubMed ID: 26016804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of three-dimensional imaging in assessing maxillary molar furcation involvement.
Walter C; Weiger R; Zitzmann NU
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 May; 37(5):436-41. PubMed ID: 20374414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography, clinical and surgical analysis for detection of maxillary molar furcation.
Oliveira PR; Sousa TO; Valladares-Neto J; Souza JAC; Silva MA; Roriz VM
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2021 Dec; 34(3):240-248. PubMed ID: 35088811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of clinical values in decision making between cone beam CT and conventional approach in furcation involvement of maxillary molar].
Zhang ZL; Jia Y; Zhang Y; Xiao L; Li XY; Li G
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Aug; 53(8):529-532. PubMed ID: 30078265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic application of intraoral ultrasonography to assess furcation involvement in mandibular first molars.
Tanaka R; Lau K; Yeung AW; Leung WK; Hayashi T; Bornstein MM; Tonetti MS; Pelekos G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Sep; 52(6):20230027. PubMed ID: 37172223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing maxillary molar furcation involvement].
Zhao HY; Wang N; Ding Y; Zheng HY; Qian JR
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 38(3):270-273. PubMed ID: 32573133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
Wood R; Sun Z; Chaudhry J; Tee BC; Kim DG; Leblebicioglu B; England G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 23452969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of cone beam imaging to assess inter-root distance in molar furcations.
Dutra DA; da Silva FB; Moreira CH; Kantorski KZ
Gen Dent; 2014; 62(2):e1-4. PubMed ID: 24598502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of the in vitro quantitative measurement of II degree furcation involvements in mandibular molars by cone-beam computed tomography].
Zhong JS; Ou-Yang XY; Liu DG; Cao CF
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Feb; 42(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 20140041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of detecting vertical root fractures in non-root filled teeth using cone beam computed tomography: effect of voxel size and fracture width.
Guo XL; Li G; Zheng JQ; Ma RH; Liu FC; Yuan FS; Lyu PJ; Guo YJ; Yin S
Int Endod J; 2019 Jun; 52(6):887-898. PubMed ID: 30661246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of voxel size on detection of fenestration, dehiscence and furcation defects using cone-beam computed tomography.
Eftekhar M; Kaviani H; Rouzmeh N; Torabinia A; Akbarzadeh Baghban A
Oral Radiol; 2021 Oct; 37(4):677-686. PubMed ID: 33432538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: an in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects.
Vandenberghe B; Jacobs R; Yang J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):252-60. PubMed ID: 18606746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiograph, cone beam computed tomography, and intrasurgical linear measurement techniques for assessing furcation defects: a longitudinal randomised controlled trial.
Yusof NAM; Noor E; Reduwan NH; Yusof MYPM
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):923-932. PubMed ID: 32535703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of non-contrast-enhanced dental magnetic resonance imaging and cone-beam computed tomography in assessing the horizontal and vertical components of furcation defects in maxillary molars: An in vivo feasibility study.
Juerchott A; Sohani M; Schwindling FS; Jende JME; Kurz FT; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Hilgenfeld T
J Clin Periodontol; 2020 Dec; 47(12):1485-1495. PubMed ID: 32990988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
