These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26337288)

  • 1. Time-Driven Effects on Processing Relative Clauses.
    Schremm A; Horne M; Roll M
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Oct; 45(5):1033-44. PubMed ID: 26337288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Canonical word order and interference-based integration costs during sentence comprehension: the case of Spanish subject- and object-relative clauses.
    del Río D; López-Higes R; Martín-Aragoneses MT
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2108-28. PubMed ID: 22524672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How accentuation influences semantic short-term memory representations during on-line speech processing: an event-related potential study.
    Li XQ; Lu Y
    Neuroscience; 2011 Oct; 193():217-28. PubMed ID: 21787842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing Italian relative clauses: working memory span and word order effects on RTs.
    Di Domenico A; Di Matteo R
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Oct; 136(4):387-406. PubMed ID: 19943612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Large-scale neural network for sentence processing.
    Cooke A; Grossman M; DeVita C; Gonzalez-Atavales J; Moore P; Chen W; Gee J; Detre J
    Brain Lang; 2006 Jan; 96(1):14-36. PubMed ID: 16168473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of age, speed of processing, and working memory on comprehension of sentences with relative clauses.
    Caplan D; Dede G; Waters G; Michaud J; Tripodis Y
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Jun; 26(2):439-50. PubMed ID: 21480714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of increased working memory load on semantic neural systems: a high-resolution event-related brain potential study.
    D'Arcy RC; Service E; Connolly JF; Hawco CS
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):177-91. PubMed ID: 15653292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses.
    Chen B; Ning A; Bi H; Dunlap S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18538740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention, working memory, and grammaticality judgment in typical young adults.
    Smith PA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):918-31. PubMed ID: 21106695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working Memory in the Processing of Long-Distance Dependencies: Interference and Filler Maintenance.
    Ness T; Meltzer-Asscher A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1353-1365. PubMed ID: 28528512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anticipating words and their gender: an event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading.
    Wicha NY; Moreno EM; Kutas M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 16(7):1272-88. PubMed ID: 15453979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses.
    Staub A
    Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):71-86. PubMed ID: 20427040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Children's use of language context in lexical ambiguity resolution.
    Khanna MM; Boland JE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):160-93. PubMed ID: 19424907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the flexibility of grammatical advance planning during sentence production: Effects of cognitive load on multiple lexical access.
    Wagner V; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):423-40. PubMed ID: 20192540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Access to lexical information in language comprehension: semantics before syntax.
    Müller O; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 16417685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemispheric asymmetries in discourse processing: evidence from false memories for lists and texts.
    Ben-Artzi E; Faust M; Moeller E
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):430-8. PubMed ID: 18951910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EEG theta and gamma responses to semantic violations in online sentence processing.
    Hald LA; Bastiaansen MC; Hagoort P
    Brain Lang; 2006 Jan; 96(1):90-105. PubMed ID: 16083953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.