BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2633732)

  • 1. The quality mammographic image. A review of its components.
    Rickard MT
    Australas Radiol; 1989 Nov; 33(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 2633732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography equipment: principles, features, selection.
    Feig SA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):897-911. PubMed ID: 3306772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image quality in mammography with special reference to anti-scatter grids and the magnification technique.
    Nielsen B; Fagerberg G
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1986; 27(4):467-79. PubMed ID: 3776678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality and dose in film-screen magnification mammography.
    McParland BJ
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1068-77. PubMed ID: 11271899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study.
    Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Grabbe E
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):478-82. PubMed ID: 12857708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnification survey and spot view mammography with a new microfocus X-ray unit: detail resolution and radiation exposure.
    Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann K; Oestmann J; Grabbe E
    Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 9510570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of fixed and variable kVp technique protocols for film-screen mammography.
    McParland BJ; Boyd MM
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Jun; 73(870):613-26. PubMed ID: 10911785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The factor of magnification in mammography].
    Maggi S; Giuseppetti GM; Spiga G; Macchini M; Procaccini G; Gregori S; Amici F
    Radiol Med; 1989; 78(1-2):101-6. PubMed ID: 2781053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammography in New Zealand: radiation dose and image quality.
    Poletti JL; Williamson BD; Mitchell AW
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1991 Jun; 14(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 1747087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Magnification mammography using 0.1 mm microfocus. Comparison of grid and spot-view magnification].
    Teubner J; Lenk JZ; Wentz KU; Georgi M
    Radiologe; 1987 Apr; 27(4):155-64. PubMed ID: 3037589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of mammographic lesion localisation and work up imaging in Australia in the digital era.
    Spuur K
    Radiography (Lond); 2019 Nov; 25(4):385-391. PubMed ID: 31582249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality control programme in mammography: second level quality controls.
    Nassivera E; Nardin L
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jun; 70(834):612-8. PubMed ID: 9227255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
    Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screen-film mammographic technique for breast cancer screening.
    Stanton L; Day JL; Villafana T; Miller CH; Lightfoot DA
    Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 3562829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grids in mammography.
    Egan RL; McSweeney MB; Sprawls P
    Radiology; 1983 Feb; 146(2):359-62. PubMed ID: 6849083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose.
    Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Cutter GR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 12674233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):628-37. PubMed ID: 2406777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of breast dose and the factors affecting breast dose in screen-film mammography.
    Ozdemir A
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2007 Sep; 13(3):134-9. PubMed ID: 17846987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.