These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26337855)

  • 1. Sterility maintenance study: Dynamic evaluation of sterilized rigid containers and wrapped instrument trays to prevent bacterial ingress.
    Shaffer HL; Harnish DA; McDonald M; Vernon RA; Heimbuch BK
    Am J Infect Control; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1336-41. PubMed ID: 26337855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of the relevance of the leak water test for the control of sterilization containers].
    Decarout L; Lambert C; Choisnard L; Andonian C; Fayard C
    Ann Pharm Fr; 2018 Nov; 76(6):464-472. PubMed ID: 30075935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A new method of testing the effectiveness of sterile packaging in general practice].
    Dunkelberg H; Wedekind S
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002 Nov; 47(11):290-3. PubMed ID: 12494550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sterilization wrap inspections do not adequately evaluate instrument sterility.
    Waked WR; Simpson AK; Miller CP; Magit DP; Grauer JN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 462():207-11. PubMed ID: 17452915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical Tray Optimization and Efficiency: The Impact of a Novel Sealed Sterile Container and Instrument Tray Technology.
    Marchand KB; Taylor KB; Salem HS; Mont MA; Marchand RC
    Surg Technol Int; 2020 Nov; 37():349-355. PubMed ID: 33245139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-dependent contamination of opened sterile operating-room trays.
    Dalstrom DJ; Venkatarayappa I; Manternach AL; Palcic MS; Heyse BA; Prayson MJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 May; 90(5):1022-5. PubMed ID: 18451394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Tests of the microbiologic barrier in sterile packaging].
    Jakimiak B; Röhm-Rodowald E
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2002; 53(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 12235676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decontamination of minimally invasive surgical endoscopes and accessories.
    Ayliffe G;
    J Hosp Infect; 2000 Aug; 45(4):263-77. PubMed ID: 10973743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-destructive vacuum decay method for pre-filled syringe closure integrity testing compared with dye ingress testing and high-voltage leak detection.
    Simonetti A; Amari F
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(1):108-22. PubMed ID: 25691719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aeration time following ethylene oxide sterilization for reusable rigid sterilization containers: concentration of gaseous ethylene oxide in containers.
    Nakata S; Umeshita K; Ueyama H; Takashina M; Noguchi S; Murata A; Ochi T
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2000; 34(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 10820640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Sterile packaging].
    Röhm-Rodowald E; Jakimiak B
    Przegl Epidemiol; 1998; 52(1-2):171-82. PubMed ID: 9738428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of the microbial barrier effectiveness of sterilization containers in terms of the log reduction value for prevention of nosocomial infections.
    Dunkelberg H; Fleitmann-Glende F
    Am J Infect Control; 2006 Jun; 34(5):285-9. PubMed ID: 16765207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Barrier properties and cost implications of a single versus a double wrap for storing sterile instrument packs.
    Webster J; Radke E; George N; Faoagali J; Harris M
    Am J Infect Control; 2005 Aug; 33(6):348-52. PubMed ID: 16061141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Ophthalmic Surgical Instrument Sterility Using Short-Cycle Sterilization for Sequential Same-Day Use.
    Chang DF; Hurley N; Mamalis N; Whitman J
    Ophthalmology; 2018 Sep; 125(9):1320-1324. PubMed ID: 29602568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Costs associated with instrument sterilization in gynecologic surgery.
    Van Meter MM; Adam RA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):652.e1-652.e5. PubMed ID: 27342044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term storage of small surgical instruments in autoclaved packages.
    Bhumisirikul W; Bhumisirikul P; Pongchairerks P
    Asian J Surg; 2003 Oct; 26(4):202-4. PubMed ID: 14530104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guidelines in Practice: Sterilization Packaging Systems.
    Link T
    AORN J; 2020 Sep; 112(3):248-260. PubMed ID: 32857412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pharmaceutical container/closure integrity. VI: A report on the utility of liquid tracer methods for evaluating the microbial barrier properties of pharmaceutical packaging.
    Kirsch LE
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2000; 54(4):305-14. PubMed ID: 10969527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective analysis of clinical detection of defective wrapping by operating room staff.
    Mobley KS; Jackson JB
    Am J Infect Control; 2018 Jul; 46(7):837-839. PubMed ID: 29395510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test to determine sterile integrity of wrapped medical products at a probability of recontamination of 1 : 1,000,000.
    Dunkelberg H; Rohmann S
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 16622814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.