These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

730 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26338030)

  • 21. Predicting N2pc from anticipatory HbO activity during sustained visuospatial attention: a concurrent fNIRS-ERP study.
    Huang J; Wang F; Ding Y; Niu H; Tian F; Liu H; Song Y
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jun; 113():225-34. PubMed ID: 25818691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Learning what matters: A neural explanation for the sparsity bias.
    Hassall CD; Connor PC; Trappenberg TP; McDonald JJ; Krigolson OE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 May; 127():62-72. PubMed ID: 29551656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relative saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of color and face singleton distractors: evidence from event-related potential studies.
    Zhang Y; Zhang H; Fu S
    Cereb Cortex; 2024 Apr; 34(4):. PubMed ID: 38679483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The control of attentional target selection in a colour/colour conjunction task.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2383-2396. PubMed ID: 27357843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attentional capture by visual singletons is mediated by top-down task set: new evidence from the N2pc component.
    Kiss M; Jolicoeur P; Dell'acqua R; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Nov; 45(6):1013-24. PubMed ID: 18801016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Early and late selection modulate competition for representation: Evidence from the N2pc in a multiple frame procedure.
    Aubin S; Jolicoeur P
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):611-22. PubMed ID: 26787529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Punishment-related memory-guided attention: Neural dynamics of perceptual modulation.
    Suárez-Suárez S; Rodríguez Holguín S; Cadaveira F; Nobre AC; Doallo S
    Cortex; 2019 Jun; 115():231-245. PubMed ID: 30852377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Event-related potentials reveal the effect of prior knowledge on competition for representation and attentional capture.
    Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Jan; 51(1):22-35. PubMed ID: 24147640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Feature-guided attentional capture cannot be prevented by spatial filtering.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Apr; 134():1-8. PubMed ID: 29458180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Category-based guidance of spatial attention during visual search for feature conjunctions.
    Nako R; Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1571-86. PubMed ID: 27213833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Electrophysiological evidence of low salience distractor interference during visual search.
    Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicœur P
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13068. PubMed ID: 29423999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Weinberger M; Awh E
    J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 41(14):3180-3191. PubMed ID: 33653697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. N2pc and attentional capture by colour and orientation-singletons in pure and mixed visual search tasks.
    Rodríguez Holguín S; Doallo S; Vizoso C; Cadaveira F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 19409424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contingent capture can occur at specific feature values: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Jiao J; Zhao G; Wang Q; Zhang K; Li H; Sun HJ; Liu Q
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 23069637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P
    Kerzel D; Burra N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1170-1183. PubMed ID: 31967520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.
    Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Behind the scenes: how visual memory load biases selective attention during processing of visual streams.
    Klaver P; Talsma D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1133-46. PubMed ID: 24015992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.