These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26338441)

  • 1. Intracervical Foley balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A review.
    Greenberg V; Khalifeh A
    Semin Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 39(6):441-3. PubMed ID: 26338441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outpatient cervical ripening.
    Amorosa JM; Stone JL
    Semin Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 39(6):488-94. PubMed ID: 26365009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.
    Lee HH; Huang BS; Cheng M; Yeh CC; Lin IC; Horng HC; Huang HY; Lee WL; Wang PH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32168947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Other mechanical methods for pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Durie D; Lawal A; Zegelbone P
    Semin Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 39(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 26341067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Induction to delivery interval using transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol: A comparative study at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.
    Garba I; Muhammed AS; Muhammad Z; Galadanci HS; Ayyuba R; Abubakar IS
    Ann Afr Med; 2016; 15(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 27549415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Afolabi BB; Oyeneyin OL; Ogedengbe OK
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Jun; 89(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 15919393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone.
    Ande AB; Ezeanochie CM; Olagbuji NB
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):967-71. PubMed ID: 22012248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
    Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low dose intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical baloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Tabowei TO; Oboro VO
    East Afr Med J; 2003 Feb; 80(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 16167722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.
    Culver J; Strauss RA; Brody S; Dorman K; Timlin S; McMahon MJ
    Am J Perinatol; 2004 Apr; 21(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 15085496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Labour induction at term--a randomised trial comparing Foley catheter plus titrated oral misoprostol solution, titrated oral misoprostol solution alone, and dinoprostone.
    Matonhodze BB; Hofmeyr GJ; Levin J
    S Afr Med J; 2003 May; 93(5):375-9. PubMed ID: 12830603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
    Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effectiveness of intracervical catheter as a labor preinduction method].
    Patro-Małysza J; Marciniak B; Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B; Bartosiewicz J; Oleszczuk J
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20232696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.
    Lanka S; Surapaneni T; Nirmalan PK
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1527-33. PubMed ID: 24888911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical ripening and induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter cervical traction.
    Kashanian M; Akbarian AR; Fekrat M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Jan; 92(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 16246342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical ripening: a randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone.
    Perry KG; Larmon JE; May WL; Robinette LG; Martin RW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1333-40. PubMed ID: 9662319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.
    Ten Eikelder ML; Oude Rengerink K; Jozwiak M; de Leeuw JW; de Graaf IM; van Pampus MG; Holswilder M; Oudijk MA; van Baaren GJ; Pernet PJ; Bax C; van Unnik GA; Martens G; Porath M; van Vliet H; Rijnders RJ; Feitsma AH; Roumen FJ; van Loon AJ; Versendaal H; Weinans MJ; Woiski M; van Beek E; Hermsen B; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
    Lancet; 2016 Apr; 387(10028):1619-28. PubMed ID: 26850983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.