These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26338854)

  • 1. Cutting Gordian Knots: Reducing Prejudice Through Attachment Security.
    Saleem M; Prot S; Cikara M; Lam BC; Anderson CA; Jelic M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1560-74. PubMed ID: 26338854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extended contact effects: is exposure to positive outgroup exemplars sufficient or is interaction with ingroup members necessary?
    Cernat V
    J Soc Psychol; 2011; 151(6):737-53. PubMed ID: 22208111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attachment theory and intergroup bias: evidence that priming the secure base schema attenuates negative reactions to out-groups.
    Mikulincer M; Shaver PR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Jul; 81(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 11474729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceiving mixed valence emotions reduces intergroup dehumanisation.
    Prati F; Giner-Sorolla R
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1018-1031. PubMed ID: 28952398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization.
    Kteily N; Hodson G; Bruneau E
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Mar; 110(3):343-70. PubMed ID: 26963763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The other side of we: when outgroup members express common identity.
    Gómez A; Dovidio JF; Huici C; Gaertner SL; Cuadrado I
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1613-26. PubMed ID: 18832337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Social categorization and empathy for outgroup members.
    Tarrant M; Dazeley S; Cottom T
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2009 Sep; 48(Pt 3):427-46. PubMed ID: 19000358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intergroup boundaries and attitudes: the power of a single potent link.
    Gulker JE; Monteith MJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Jul; 39(7):943-55. PubMed ID: 23613121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A joke is just a joke (except when it isn't): cavalier humor beliefs facilitate the expression of group dominance motives.
    Hodson G; Rush J; Macinnis CC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Oct; 99(4):660-82. PubMed ID: 20919777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attachment and prejudice: The mediating role of empathy.
    Boag EM; Carnelley KB
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2016 Jun; 55(2):337-56. PubMed ID: 26549740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland.
    Tam T; Hewstone M; Kenworthy J; Cairns E
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jan; 35(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 19106077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Entitativity and intergroup bias: How belonging to a cohesive group allows people to express their prejudices.
    Effron DA; Knowles ED
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 Feb; 108(2):234-53. PubMed ID: 25603374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries.
    Binder J; Zagefka H; Brown R; Funke F; Kessler T; Mummendey A; Maquil A; Demoulin S; Leyens JP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Apr; 96(4):843-56. PubMed ID: 19309206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Antecedents and consequences of social identity complexity: intergroup contact, distinctiveness threat, and outgroup attitudes.
    Schmid K; Hewstone M; Tausch N; Cairns E; Hughes J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1085-98. PubMed ID: 19506033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Striving for success in outgroup settings: effects of contextually emphasizing ingroup dimensions on stigmatized group members' social identity and performance styles.
    Derks B; van Laar C; Ellemers N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 May; 32(5):576-88. PubMed ID: 16702152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Responses to endorsement of commonality by ingroup and outgroup members: the roles of group representation and threat.
    Gómez Á; Dovidio JF; Gaertner SL; Fernández S; Vázquez A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Apr; 39(4):419-31. PubMed ID: 23456560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Promoting us or preventing them: regulatory focus and manifestations of intergroup bias.
    Shah JY; Brazy PC; Higgins ET
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Apr; 30(4):433-46. PubMed ID: 15070473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do dominant group members have different emotional responses to observing dominant-on-dominant versus dominant-on-disadvantaged ostracism? Some evidence for heightened reactivity to potentially discriminatory ingroup behavior.
    Petsnik C; Vorauer JD
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234540. PubMed ID: 32584831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ingroup as pars pro toto: projection from the ingroup onto the inclusive category as a precursor to social discrimination.
    Wenzel M; Mummendey A; Weber U; Waldzus S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Apr; 29(4):461-73. PubMed ID: 15273001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When trying to understand detracts from trying to behave: effects of perspective taking in intergroup interaction.
    Vorauer JD; Martens V; Sasaki SJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Apr; 96(4):811-27. PubMed ID: 19309204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.