These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26339101)

  • 1. Toward a Standard Approach to Operationalizing Coercive Control and Classifying Violence Types.
    Hardesty JL; Crossman KA; Haselschwerdt ML; Raffaelli M; Ogolsky BG; Johnson MP
    J Marriage Fam; 2015 Aug; 77(4):833-843. PubMed ID: 26339101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring Variations Within Situational Couple Violence and Comparisons With Coercive Controlling Violence and No Violence/No Control.
    Nielsen SK; Hardesty JL; Raffaelli M
    Violence Against Women; 2016 Feb; 22(2):206-24. PubMed ID: 26333282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extending Johnson's Typology: Additional Manifestations of Dating Violence and Coercive Control.
    Conroy NE; Crowley CG
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Aug; 37(15-16):NP13315-NP13341. PubMed ID: 33825588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Types of Partner Violence in Couples Affected by Incarceration: Applying Johnson's Typology to Understand the Couple-level Context for Violence.
    McKay T; Tueller S; Landwehr J; Johnson MP
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 May; 37(9-10):NP8056-NP8087. PubMed ID: 33246389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "He Could Scare Me Without Laying a Hand on Me": Mothers' Experiences of Nonviolent Coercive Control During Marriage and After Separation.
    Crossman KA; Hardesty JL; Raffaelli M
    Violence Against Women; 2016 Mar; 22(4):454-73. PubMed ID: 26400777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intimate Terrorism and Situational Couple Violence: Classification Variability Across Five Methods to Distinguish Johnson's Violent Relationship Types.
    Eckstein JJ
    Violence Vict; 2017 Dec; 32(6):955-976. PubMed ID: 29017637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Divorcing Mothers' Use of Protective Strategies: Differences Over Time and by Violence Experience.
    Haselschwerdt ML; Mitchell ET; Raffaelli M; Hardesty JL
    Psychol Violence; 2016 Jan; 6(1):182-192. PubMed ID: 26858851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intimate partner violence, coercive control, and child adjustment problems.
    Jouriles EN; McDonald R
    J Interpers Violence; 2015 Feb; 30(3):459-74. PubMed ID: 24923886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Historical Coercive Control, Historical Violence, and Lawyer Representation on Post-Separation Male Partner Violence Against Mother Litigants Who Participated in Adversarial Family Court Proceedings.
    Ellis D; Lewis T; Nepon T
    Violence Against Women; 2021 Jul; 27(9):1191-1210. PubMed ID: 32567535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. COVID-19 lockdowns, intimate partner violence and coercive control.
    Smyth C; Cullen P; Breckenridge J; Cortis N; Valentine K
    Aust J Soc Issues; 2021 Sep; 56(3):359-373. PubMed ID: 34188336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sex differences in intimate partner violence and the use of coercive control as a motivational factor for intimate partner violence.
    Tanha M; Beck CJ; Figueredo AJ; Raghavan C
    J Interpers Violence; 2010 Oct; 25(10):1836-54. PubMed ID: 20018921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring coercive control: what can we learn from national population surveys?
    Myhill A
    Violence Against Women; 2015 Mar; 21(3):355-75. PubMed ID: 25680801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coercive forms of sexual risk and associated violence perpetrated by male partners of female adolescents.
    Silverman JG; McCauley HL; Decker MR; Miller E; Reed E; Raj A
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2011 Mar; 43(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 21388506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Burden of intimate partner violence in The Gambia - a cross sectional study of pregnant women.
    Idoko P; Ogbe E; Jallow O; Ocheke A
    Reprod Health; 2015 Apr; 12():34. PubMed ID: 25895955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Explaining aboriginal/non-aboriginal inequalities in postseparation violence against Canadian women: application of a structural violence approach.
    Pedersen JS; Malcoe LH; Pulkingham J
    Violence Against Women; 2013 Aug; 19(8):1034-58. PubMed ID: 24048189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does the situational couple violence- intimate terrorism typology explain cohabitors' high risk of intimate partner violence?
    Brownridge DA
    J Interpers Violence; 2010 Jul; 25(7):1264-83. PubMed ID: 19729674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rethinking Coercive Control.
    Stark E
    Violence Against Women; 2009 Dec; 15(12):1509-25. PubMed ID: 19850959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intimate terrorism and situational couple violence in general surveys: ex-spouses required.
    Johnson MP; Leone JM; Xu Y
    Violence Against Women; 2014 Feb; 20(2):186-207. PubMed ID: 24504325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual assault and other types of violence in intimate partner relationships.
    Alsaker K; Morken T; Baste V; Campos-Serna J; Moen BE
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Mar; 91(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 22168466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intimate terrorism and common couple violence. A test of Johnson's predictions in four British samples.
    Graham-Kevan N; Archer J
    J Interpers Violence; 2003 Nov; 18(11):1247-70. PubMed ID: 19774764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.