These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26339718)

  • 1. Non-semantic contributions to "semantic" redundancy gain.
    Shepherdson P; Miller J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(8):1564-82. PubMed ID: 26339718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Redundancy gain in semantic categorisation.
    Shepherdson P; Miller J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():96-106. PubMed ID: 24508611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does semantic redundancy gain result from multiple semantic priming?
    Schröter H; Bratzke D; Fiedler A; Birngruber T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Oct; 161():79-85. PubMed ID: 26342771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. N400-like potentials and reaction times index semantic relations between highly repeated individual words.
    Renoult L; Debruille JB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):905-22. PubMed ID: 19929764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Congruency effects in conceptualizing for speech.
    Kuipers JR; La Heij W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2155-68. PubMed ID: 22630114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of semantic matching and of semantic category on reaction time and N400 that resist numerous repetitions.
    Debruille JB; Renoult L
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):506-17. PubMed ID: 18983862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Redundancy gain for semantic features.
    Fiedler A; Schröter H; Ulrich R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Jun; 20(3):474-80. PubMed ID: 23250760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repetition-priming modulates category-related effects on event-related potentials: further evidence for multiple cortical semantic systems.
    Kiefer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 17(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 15811233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Depth-of-processing effects on semantic activation deficits in schizophrenia: an electrophysiological investigation.
    Kiang M; Christensen BK; Zipursky RB
    Schizophr Res; 2011 Dec; 133(1-3):91-8. PubMed ID: 21868201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longitudinal changes in semantic categorization performance after symptomatic remission from first-episode psychosis: a 3-year follow-up study.
    Hui CL; Longenecker J; Wong GH; Tang JY; Chang WC; Chan SK; Lee EH; Dunn EL; Miao MY; Yeung WS; Wong CK; Chan WF; Tang WN; Chen EY
    Schizophr Res; 2012 May; 137(1-3):118-23. PubMed ID: 22449835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semantic categorization precedes affective evaluation of visual scenes.
    Nummenmaa L; Hyönä J; Calvo MG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):222-46. PubMed ID: 20438250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Procedural learning of semantic categorization in Parkinson's disease.
    Arroyo-Anlló EM; Ingrand P; Neau JP; Gil R
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2015; 45(1):205-16. PubMed ID: 25502765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The semantic origin of unconscious priming: Behavioral and event-related potential evidence during category congruency priming from strongly and weakly related masked words.
    Ortells JJ; Kiefer M; Castillo A; Megías M; Morillas A
    Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():143-57. PubMed ID: 26412392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of the left anterior temporal lobe in the semantic processing of famous faces.
    Brambati SM; Benoit S; Monetta L; Belleville S; Joubert S
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):674-81. PubMed ID: 20600979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semantic processing in the production of numerals across notations.
    Herrera A; Macizo P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 21823811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of semantic processing and response latency on the SNARC effect.
    Didino D; Breil C; Knops A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 May; 196():75-86. PubMed ID: 31004938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explicit semantic tasks are necessary to study semantic priming effects with high rates of repetition.
    Renoult L; Wang X; Mortimer J; Debruille JB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 123(4):741-54. PubMed ID: 21958657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Access to lexical information in language comprehension: semantics before syntax.
    Müller O; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 16417685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Word semantics is processed even without attentional effort.
    Relander K; Rämä P; Kujala T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1511-22. PubMed ID: 18823236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Controlling the unconscious: attentional task sets modulate subliminal semantic and visuomotor processes differentially.
    Martens U; Ansorge U; Kiefer M
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Feb; 22(2):282-91. PubMed ID: 21245492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.