235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26340014)
21. A Prospective Clinical Study of Alumina-Toughened Zirconia Abutments for Implant-Supported Fixed Restorations with a Mean Follow-up Period of 6.9 Years.
Yoon HI; Yeo IL; Kim DJ; Kim HY; Han JS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):451-460. PubMed ID: 30883621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns.
Ellakwa A; Raj T; Deeb S; Ronaghi G; Martin FE; Klineberg I
Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical evaluation of ceramic implant abutments in anterior restorations.
Chen ZF; Nang PH; Wang Y; Luo ZB
Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2008 Jun; 19():67-70. PubMed ID: 22073456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Four-year clinical results of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia substructures (Cercon): end abutments vs. cantilever design.
Wolfart S; Harder S; Eschbach S; Lehmann F; Kern M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Dec; 117(6):741-9. PubMed ID: 20121939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of custom-made procera ceramic abutments for single-implant tooth replacement: a prospective 1-year follow-up study.
Henriksson K; Jemt T
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):626-30. PubMed ID: 14714842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A study on the fracture strength of implant-supported restorations using milled ceramic abutments and all-ceramic crowns.
Cho HW; Dong JK; Jin TH; Oh SC; Lee HH; Lee JW
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11887605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
Wadhwani C; Chung KH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Current status of implant-abutment--part 1: abutments for cemented versus screw retained restorations].
Harel N; Livne S; Piek D; Marku-Cohen S; Ormianer Z
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2012 Jan; 29(1):19-25, 63. PubMed ID: 22991873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A retrospective analysis of 125 single molar crowns supported by two implants: long-term follow-up from 3 to 12 years.
Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ; Wulc DA; Balshi SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):148-53. PubMed ID: 21365050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Conometric Concept: A Two-Year Follow-Up of Fixed Partial CEREC Restorations Supported By Cone-In-Cone Abutments.
Degidi M; Nardi D; Sighinolfi G; Degidi D; Piattelli A
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e780-e787. PubMed ID: 30295374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Waldenberger O; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of crown/implant ratio and crown height space on stress distribution in unsplinted implant supporting restorations.
Nissan J; Ghelfan O; Gross O; Priel I; Gross M; Chaushu G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1934-9. PubMed ID: 21530042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Survival and Mechanical Complications of Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations Using Prefabricated Titanium Abutments: A Medium- and Long-Term Retrospective Analysis with up to 10 Years Follow-up.
Di Francesco F; De Marco G; Cristache CM; Vernal R; Cafferata EA; Lanza A
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(3):278-286. PubMed ID: 35727261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical evaluation of the incidence of prosthetic complications in implant crowns constructed with UCLA castable abutments. A cohort follow-up study.
Montero J; Manzano G; Beltrán D; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ; Castillo-Oyagüe R
J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1081-9. PubMed ID: 22982530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function.
Sailer I; Zembic A; Jung RE; Siegenthaler D; Holderegger C; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19397632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Screw vs cement-implant-retained restorations: an experimental study in the beagle. Part 2. Immunohistochemical evaluation of the peri-implant tissues.
Assenza B; Artese L; Scarano A; Rubini C; Perrotti V; Piattelli M; Thams U; San Roman F; Piccirilli M; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16526575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
