These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26340604)

  • 1. High Glasgow Blatchford Score at admission is associated with recurrent bleeding after discharge for patients hospitalized with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Sengupta N; Tapper EB; Patwardhan VR; Ketwaroo GA; Thaker AM; Leffler DA; Feuerstein JD
    Endoscopy; 2016 Jan; 48(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 26340604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Wang CH; Chen YW; Young YR; Yang CJ; Chen IC
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 May; 31(5):775-8. PubMed ID: 23465874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended?
    Le Jeune IR; Gordon AL; Farrugia D; Manwani R; Guha IN; James MW
    Acute Med; 2011; 10(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 22111089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Bozkurt S; Köse A; Arslan ED; Erdoğan S; Üçbilek E; Çevik İ; Ayrık C; Sezgin O
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2015 Dec; 23():109. PubMed ID: 26714636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of risk scoring systems in predicting clinical outcome at upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in an emergency unit.
    Dicu D; Pop F; Ionescu D; Dicu T
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Jan; 31(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 23000328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development, Validation, and Comparative Assessment of an International Scoring System to Determine Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Oakland K; Kahan BC; Guizzetti L; Martel M; Bryant RV; Brahmania M; Singh S; Nguyen NQ; Sey MSL; Barkun A; Jairath V
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 17(6):1121-1129.e2. PubMed ID: 30268566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thirty-Day Readmission Among Patients With Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage and Effects on Outcomes.
    Abougergi MS; Peluso H; Saltzman JR
    Gastroenterology; 2018 Jul; 155(1):38-46.e1. PubMed ID: 29601829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment and prognosis in peptic ulcer bleeding.
    Laursen SB
    Dan Med J; 2014 Jan; 61(1):B4797. PubMed ID: 24547604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
    Chen IC; Hung MS; Chiu TF; Chen JC; Hsiao CT
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The risks of thromboembolism vs. recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding after interruption of systemic anticoagulation in hospitalized inpatients with gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective study.
    Sengupta N; Feuerstein JD; Patwardhan VR; Tapper EB; Ketwaroo GA; Thaker AM; Leffler DA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Feb; 110(2):328-35. PubMed ID: 25512338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage?
    Reed EA; Dalton H; Blatchford O; Ashley D; Mowat C; Gaya DR; Cahill A; Warshow U; Hare N; Groome M; Forrest EH; Morris J; Stanley AJ
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 26(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 24535596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective multicenter validation of the Glasgow Blatchford bleeding score in the management of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage presenting at an emergency department.
    Aquarius M; Smeets FG; Konijn HW; Stassen PM; Keulen ET; Van Deursen CT; Masclee AA; Keulemans YC
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Sep; 27(9):1011-6. PubMed ID: 26049709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
    Budimir I; Gradišer M; Nikolić M; Baršić N; Ljubičić N; Kralj D; Budimir I
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study.
    Zhong M; Chen WJ; Lu XY; Qian J; Zhu CQ
    J Dig Dis; 2016 Dec; 17(12):820-828. PubMed ID: 27930875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Sengupta N; Tapper EB; Patwardhan VR; Ketwaroo GA; Thaker AM; Leffler DA; Feuerstein JD
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2015 Aug; 90(8):1021-9. PubMed ID: 26141075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.