254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26342188)
1. A comparison of postoperative pain after transumbilical single-port access and conventional three-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Chung JH; Baek JM; Chung K; Park EK; Jeung IC; Chang HT; Choi JH; Kim CJ; Lee YS
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Dec; 94(12):1290-6. PubMed ID: 26342188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abdominal, multi-port and single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: eleven-year trends comparison of surgical outcomes complications of 936 cases.
Kim SM; Park EK; Jeung IC; Kim CJ; Lee YS
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1313-9. PubMed ID: 25488157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes.
Yim GW; Jung YW; Paek J; Lee SH; Kwon HY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim JH; Kim YT; Kim SW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 203(1):26.e1-6. PubMed ID: 20417481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized prospective study of single-port and four-port approaches for hysterectomy in terms of postoperative pain.
Jung YW; Lee M; Yim GW; Lee SH; Paek JH; Kwon HY; Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim YT
Surg Endosc; 2011 Aug; 25(8):2462-9. PubMed ID: 21298522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Operative outcomes of single-port-access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with single-port-access total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Yoon BS; Seong SJ; Kim IH; Song T; Kim ML; Kim MK
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):486-9. PubMed ID: 25510688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized trial.
Li M; Han Y; Feng YC
J Int Med Res; 2012; 40(2):701-8. PubMed ID: 22613433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-port vs. conventional multi-port access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of surgical outcomes and complications.
Choi YS; Park JN; Oh YS; Sin KS; Choi J; Eun DS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(2):366-9. PubMed ID: 23664457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minilaparoscopic versus single-port total hysterectomy: a randomized trial.
Fanfani F; Fagotti A; Gagliardi ML; Monterossi G; Rossitto C; Costantini B; Gueli Alletti S; Vizzielli G; Ercoli A; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 23332717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing technique: a randomized controlled trial.
Allam IS; Makled AK; Gomaa IA; El Bishry GM; Bayoumy HA; Ali DF
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1341-5. PubMed ID: 25524534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy with Korean-made OCTO Port: Turkish surgeons' initial experience.
Kale A; Terzi H; Yavuz A; Kale E
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016; 36(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 26408502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does single-port laparoscopic surgery reduce postoperative pain in women with benign gynecologic disease?
Eom JM; Choi JS; Choi WJ; Kim YH; Lee JH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 Dec; 23(12):999-1005. PubMed ID: 24083850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the management of endometrial cancer: a randomized clinical trial.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Bergamini V; Uccella S; Beretta P; Franchi M; Bolis P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 16527713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is single-port access laparoscopy less painful than conventional laparoscopy for adnexal surgery? A comparison of postoperative pain and surgical outcomes.
Yim GW; Lee M; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT; Kim SW
Surg Innov; 2013 Feb; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 22410390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-port access versus conventional multi-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very large uterus.
Lee J; Kim S; Nam EJ; Hwang SM; Kim YT; Kim SW
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2015 May; 58(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 26023674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Using a 5-mm Versus 10-mm Laparoscope: A Randomized Control Trial.
Acton JN; Salfinger SG; Tan J; Cohen PA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 26371370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning curve and surgical outcome for single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy in 100 consecutive cases.
Paek J; Kim SW; Lee SH; Lee M; Yim GW; Nam EJ; Kim YT
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011; 72(4):227-33. PubMed ID: 22067204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri.
Sesti F; Cosi V; Calonzi F; Ruggeri V; Pietropolli A; Di Francesco L; Piccione E
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 24710800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomised trial.
Janda M; Gebski V; Brand A; Hogg R; Jobling TW; Land R; Manolitsas T; McCartney A; Nascimento M; Neesham D; Nicklin JL; Oehler MK; Otton G; Perrin L; Salfinger S; Hammond I; Leung Y; Walsh T; Sykes P; Ngan H; Garrett A; Laney M; Ng TY; Tam K; Chan K; Wrede CD; Pather S; Simcock B; Farrell R; Obermair A
Lancet Oncol; 2010 Aug; 11(8):772-80. PubMed ID: 20638899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postoperative analgesic requirements - total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy.
Nascimento MC; Kelley A; Martitsch C; Weidner I; Obermair A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Apr; 45(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 15760316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy mean reduced pain? A retrospective cohort analysis between SPA and conventional laparoscopy.
Kim TJ; Lee YY; An JJ; Choi CH; Lee JW; Kim BG; Bae DS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 May; 162(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 22336230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
