These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26342449)

  • 1. Establishing the Learning Curve of Robotic Sacral Colpopexy in a Start-up Robotics Program.
    Sharma S; Calixte R; Finamore PS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 26342449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.
    Antosh DD; Grotzke SA; McDonald MA; Shveiky D; Park AJ; Gutman RE; Sokol AI
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22543767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The 26-Minute Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy: Do We Really Need Robotic Technology?
    Miklos JR; Moore RD
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(5):712. PubMed ID: 25769671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.
    Buckley de Meritens A; Kim J; Dinkelspiel H; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo T; Holcomb KM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27867048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introduction of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy to a fellowship training program.
    Kantartzis K; Sutkin G; Winger D; Wang L; Shepherd J
    Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1877-81. PubMed ID: 23549650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program: understanding institutional and individual learning curves.
    Guend H; Widmar M; Patel S; Nash GM; Paty PB; Guillem JG; Temple LK; Garcia-Aguilar J; Weiser MR
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2820-2828. PubMed ID: 27815742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
    Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
    Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences.
    Pulliam SJ; Weinstein MM; Wakamatsu MM
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 22453324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh.
    Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation on clinical effectiveness of modified laparoscopic sacral colpopexy].
    Zhang XW; Xu L; Li YX; Gan YP; Chen LQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):570-4. PubMed ID: 24199920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic Sacral Colpopexy.
    Powell CR; Tachibana I; Eckrich B; Rothenberg J; Hathaway J
    J Endourol; 2018 May; 32(S1):S111-S116. PubMed ID: 29774820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive surgery in urogynecology: a comparison of standard laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, percutaneous surgical system, and robotic sacral colpopexy.
    Panico G; Campagna G; Vacca L; Caramazza D; Iannone V; Rossitto C; Rumolo V; Scambia G; Ercoli A
    Minerva Med; 2021 Aug; 112(4):483-491. PubMed ID: 32272829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the learning curve of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Linder BJ; Anand M; Weaver AL; Woelk JL; Klingele CJ; Trabuco EC; Occhino JA; Gebhart JB
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Feb; 27(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 26294206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with Gynemesh as graft material--experience and results.
    Agarwala N; Hasiak N; Shade M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 17848318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.
    Lopez S; Mulla ZD; Hernandez L; Garza DM; Payne TN; Farnam RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 26321172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning curve analysis of intracorporeal cuff suturing during robotic single-site total hysterectomy.
    Akdemir A; Zeybek B; Ozgurel B; Oztekin MK; Sendag F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 24952342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementing robotic surgery to gynecologic oncology: the first 300 operations performed at a tertiary hospital.
    Mäenpää M; Nieminen K; Tomás E; Luukkaala T; Mäenpää JU
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 May; 94(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 25721212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-Term Effectiveness of Uterosacral Colpopexy and Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Unger CA; Barber MD; Walters MD; Paraiso MFR; Ridgeway B; Jelovsek JE
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):188-194. PubMed ID: 27636212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.