157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26342584)
1. Reducing under-reporting of stigmatized health events using the List Experiment: results from a randomized, population-based study of abortion in Liberia.
Moseson H; Massaquoi M; Dehlendorf C; Bawo L; Dahn B; Zolia Y; Vittinghoff E; Hiatt RA; Gerdts C
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 44(6):1951-8. PubMed ID: 26342584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multivariable regression analysis of list experiment data on abortion: results from a large, randomly-selected population based study in Liberia.
Moseson H; Gerdts C; Dehlendorf C; Hiatt RA; Vittinghoff E
Popul Health Metr; 2017 Dec; 15(1):40. PubMed ID: 29268794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing underreporting of stigmatized pregnancy outcomes: results from a mixed-methods study of self-managed abortion in Texas using the list-experiment method.
Moseson H; Filippa S; Baum SE; Gerdts C; Grossman D
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Sep; 19(1):113. PubMed ID: 31481033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating abortion prevalence and understanding perspectives of community leaders and providers: Results from a mixed-method study in Istanbul, Turkey.
Huber-Krum S; Karadon D; Kurutas S; Rohr J; Baykal SS; Okcuoglu BA; Esmer Y; Canning D; Shah I
Womens Health (Lond); 2020; 16():1745506520953353. PubMed ID: 32853055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The List Experiment for Measuring Abortion: What We Know and What We Need.
Moseson H; Treleaven E; Gerdts C; Diamond-Smith N
Stud Fam Plann; 2017 Dec; 48(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 29148056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can a List Experiment Improve Validity of Abortion Measurement?
Bell SO; Bishai D
Stud Fam Plann; 2019 Mar; 50(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 30675727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing underreporting of abortion in surveys: Results from two test applications of the list experiment method in Malawi and Senegal.
Moseson H; Jayaweera R; Huber-Krum S; Garver S; Norris A; Gerdts C
PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247201. PubMed ID: 33657126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of abortion incidence estimates derived from direct survey questions versus the list experiment among women in Ohio.
Hood RB; Moseson H; Smith M; Chakraborty P; Norris AH; Gallo MF
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0269476. PubMed ID: 35657985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Application of the List Experiment to Estimate Abortion Prevalence in Karachi, Pakistan.
Huber-Krum S; Hackett K; Kaur N; Nausheen S; Soofi S; Canning D; Shah I
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2020 Dec; 46(Suppl 1):13-24. PubMed ID: 33326396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion Reporting in the United States: An Assessment of Three National Fertility Surveys.
Lindberg L; Kost K; Maddow-Zimet I; Desai S; Zolna M
Demography; 2020 Jun; 57(3):899-925. PubMed ID: 32458318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The list experiment: An approach to measuring stigmatized behaviours related to sex-selective abortion.
Treleaven E; Pham TN; Nguyen AD; Diamond-Smith N
Popul Stud (Camb); 2021 Nov; 75(3):363-380. PubMed ID: 33792524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of ACASI on Reporting of Abortion and Other Pregnancy Outcomes in the US National Survey of Family Growth.
Lindberg L; Scott RH
Stud Fam Plann; 2018 Sep; 49(3):259-278. PubMed ID: 30040126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring the extent of abortion underreporting in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.
Fu H; Darroch JE; Henshaw SK; Kolb E
Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(3):128-33, 138. PubMed ID: 9635261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The stigma of having an abortion: development of a scale and characteristics of women experiencing abortion stigma.
Cockrill K; Upadhyay UD; Turan J; Greene Foster D
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2013 Jun; 45(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 23750622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating the lifetime incidence of induced abortion and understanding abortion practices in a Northeastern Tanzania community through a household survey.
Elewonibi B; Amour C; Gleason S; Msuya S; Canning D; Shah I
Contraception; 2021 Feb; 103(2):127-131. PubMed ID: 33098850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving abortion underreporting in the USA: a cognitive interview study.
Mueller J; Kirstein M; VandeVusse A; Lindberg LD
Cult Health Sex; 2023 Jan; 25(1):126-141. PubMed ID: 36007884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors associated with unmet need for modern contraception in post-conflict Liberia.
Pack AP; McCarraher DR; Chen M; Okigbo CC; Albert LM; Wambugu S
Afr J Reprod Health; 2014 Jun; 18(2):58-67. PubMed ID: 25022142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incidence of induced abortion determined by the randomised response technique.
Rajapaksa LC; Perera DC
Ceylon Med J; 1994 Mar; 39(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 8194140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel approaches to estimating abortion incidence.
Sedgh G; Keogh SC
Reprod Health; 2019 Apr; 16(1):44. PubMed ID: 30999917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intimate partner violence and unwanted pregnancy, miscarriage, induced abortion, and stillbirth among a national sample of Bangladeshi women.
Silverman JG; Gupta J; Decker MR; Kapur N; Raj A
BJOG; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1246-52. PubMed ID: 17877676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
