BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

639 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26343421)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of two different nickel-titanium rotary files in curved root canals of extracted human molar teeth.
    Ferrara G; Taschieri S; Corbella S; Ceci C; Del Fabbro M; Machtou P
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 Feb; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 26343421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals.
    Bürklein S; Mathey D; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2015 Aug; 48(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 25156248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
    Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals.
    Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 24697590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A comparative study of three different rotary nickel titanium systems in the preparation of curved molar canals].
    Gu YX; Zhu YQ; DU R
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2009 Apr; 18(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19417989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
    J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
    Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography.
    Özer SY
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 21167759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
    Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
    Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of apical transportation caused by nickel-titanium rotary systems with full rotation and reciprocating movements using extracted teeth and resin blocks with simulated root canals: A comparative study.
    Alrahabi M; Zafar MS
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Jun; 21(6):772-777. PubMed ID: 29888726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
    Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
    Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
    Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals.
    D'Amario M; Baldi M; Petricca R; De Angelis F; El Abed R; D'Arcangelo C
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1581-4. PubMed ID: 24238451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shaping Ability of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper NEXT and WaveOne Primary in Severely Curved Resin Blocks.
    Tavanafar S; Gilani PV; Saleh AM; Schäfer E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Mar; 20(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 31204330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of centring ability and transportation between four nickel titanium instrumentation techniques by micro-computed tomography.
    Saberi N; Patel S; Mannocci F
    Int Endod J; 2017 Jun; 50(6):595-603. PubMed ID: 27159500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison on the shaping ability of three different instruments in preparing curved molar canals].
    Zhu YQ; Gu YX; Du R
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 23(5):393-6. PubMed ID: 16285543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.