These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26344699)

  • 1. SAR compliance assessment of PMR 446 and FRS walkie-talkies.
    Vermeeren G; Joseph W; Martens L
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2015 Oct; 36(7):517-26. PubMed ID: 26344699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electromagnetic interference of external pacemakers by walkie-talkies and digital cellular phones: experimental study.
    Trigano AJ; Azoulay A; Rochdi M; Campillo A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Apr; 22(4 Pt 1):588-93. PubMed ID: 10234711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radio frequency electromagnetic field compliance assessment of multi-band and MIMO equipped radio base stations.
    Thors B; Thielens A; Fridén J; Colombi D; Törnevik C; Vermeeren G; Martens L; Joseph W
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 May; 35(4):296-308. PubMed ID: 24523232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of safety distance limits for a human near a cellular base station antenna, adopting the IEEE standard or ICNIRP guidelines.
    Cooper J; Marx B; Buhl J; Hombach V
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2002 Sep; 23(6):429-43. PubMed ID: 12210561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variation of the dielectric properties of tissues with age: the effect on the values of SAR in children when exposed to walkie-talkie devices.
    Peyman A; Gabriel C; Grant EH; Vermeeren G; Martens L
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):227-41. PubMed ID: 19088390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Development of innovative methods of electromagnetic field evaluation for portable radio-station].
    Rubtsova NB; Perov SIu; Bogacheva EV; Kuster N
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2013; (2):9-13. PubMed ID: 23785811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wireless communication devices and electromagnetic interference. ECRI's updated recommendations.
    Health Devices; 2001 Nov; 30(11):403-9. PubMed ID: 11770229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antenna modeling considerations for accurate SAR calculations in human phantoms in close proximity to GSM cellular base station antennas.
    van Wyk MJ; Bingle M; Meyer FJ
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2005 Sep; 26(6):502-9. PubMed ID: 15931680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interaction of mobile phones with superficial passive metallic implants.
    Virtanen H; Huttunen J; Toropainen A; Lappalainen R
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2689-700. PubMed ID: 15901963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occupational exposures to radiofrequency fields: results of an Israeli national survey.
    Hareuveny R; Kavet R; Shachar A; Margaliot M; Kheifets L
    J Radiol Prot; 2015 Jun; 35(2):429-45. PubMed ID: 25978146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cell phones and walkie-talkies. Is it time to relax your restrictive policies?
    Health Devices; 1999 Oct; 28(10):409-13. PubMed ID: 10533681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields from smart utility meters in GB; part II) numerical assessment of induced SAR within the human body.
    Qureshi MRA; Alfadhl Y; Chen X; Peyman A; Maslanyj M; Mann S
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2018 Apr; 39(3):200-216. PubMed ID: 29143352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Specific absorption rate and electric field measurements in the near field of six mobile phone base station antennas.
    Toivonen T; Toivo T; Puranen L; Jokela K
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 May; 30(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 19194889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of mobile phone design features affecting radiofrequency power absorbed in a human head phantom.
    Kuehn S; Kelsh MA; Kuster N; Sheppard AR; Shum M
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2013 Sep; 34(6):479-88. PubMed ID: 23533135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Walkie talkies cause more electromagnetic interference to medical equipment than mobile phones.
    Stroud DB; Huang Y; Hansen L; McKenzie R
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2006 Dec; 29(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 17260586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and simulation of printed spiral coil used in wireless power transmission systems for implant medical devices.
    Wu W; Fang Q
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():4018-21. PubMed ID: 22255221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Walkie-talkies and cellular telephones: the hazards of electromagnetic interference in hospitals.
    Tan KS; Hinberg I
    Leadersh Health Serv; 1994; 3(3):11-5. PubMed ID: 10135105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of the effect of mobile phone base station antenna loading on localized SAR and its consequences for measurements.
    Hansson B; Thors B; Törnevik C
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2011 Dec; 32(8):664-72. PubMed ID: 21647933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Near-field radiofrequency electromagnetic exposure assessment.
    Rubtsova N; Perov S; Belaya O; Kuster N; Balzano Q
    Electromagn Biol Med; 2015 Sep; 34(3):180-2. PubMed ID: 26444190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Assessment of the safety of toys with special reference to electromagnetic safety in view of binding regulations: a pilot study].
    Mamrot P; Zmyślony M; Politański P; Aniołczyk H
    Med Pr; 2005; 56(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 15998001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.