These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26346033)

  • 1. Twenty-year outcome of aortic valve replacement with St. Jude Medical mechanical valves in Japanese patients.
    Minakata K; Tanaka S; Okawa Y; Kaneko T; Okonogi S; Usui A; Abe T; Tamura N; Yanagi S; Sakata R
    Circ J; 2015; 79(11):2380-8. PubMed ID: 26346033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term follow up of patients undergoing reoperative surgery with aortic or mitral valve replacement using a St. Jude Medical prosthesis.
    Emery RW; Krogh CC; McAdams S; Emery AM; Holter AR
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jul; 19(4):473-84. PubMed ID: 20845896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Silzone Era St. Jude Medical Mechanical Heart Valves.
    Brennan JM; Zhao Y; Williams J; O'Brien S; Dokholyan R; Gammie J; Edwards F; Loyo-Berrios N; Canos D; Gross T; Marinac-Dabic D; Peterson E
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Jan; 24(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 26182622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single center experience with the Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis: a 17-year clinical follow-up.
    Celiento M; Filaferro L; Milano AD; Anastasio G; Ferrari G; Bortolotti U
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):2039-44. PubMed ID: 24332112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
    Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.
    Isaacs AJ; Shuhaiber J; Salemi A; Isom OW; Sedrakyan A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 May; 149(5):1262-9.e3. PubMed ID: 25791947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single-institution, 22-year follow-up of 786 CarboMedics mechanical valves used for both primary surgery and reoperation.
    Nishida T; Sonoda H; Oishi Y; Tanoue Y; Nakashima A; Shiokawa Y; Tominaga R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 May; 147(5):1493-8. PubMed ID: 23856208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term follow-up after aortic valve replacement with Edwards Prima Plus stentless bioprostheses in patients younger than 60 years of age.
    Christ T; Grubitzsch H; Claus B; Konertz W
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):264-9. PubMed ID: 23158257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mid-term results of aortic root replacement using a self-assembled biological composite graft.
    Meszaros K; Liniger S; Czerny M; Stanger O; Reineke D; Englberger L; Carrel TP
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Oct; 19(4):584-9. PubMed ID: 24994702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision-making in the choice of heart valve for replacement in patients aged 60-70 years: twenty-year follow up of the St. Jude Medical aortic valve prosthesis.
    Emery RW; Arom KV; Kshettry VR; Kroshus TJ; Von R; Kersten TE; Lillehei TJ; Nicoloff DM; Erickson CA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11 Suppl 1():S37-44. PubMed ID: 11843519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CardiaMed mechanical valve: mid-term results of a multicenter clinical trial.
    Nazarov VM; Zheleznev SI; Bogachev-Prokophiev AV; Afanasyev AV; Nemchenko EV; Jeltovskiy YV; Lavinyukov SO
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2014 Jan; 22(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 24585637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Choice of Aortic Valve Prosthesis in a Rapidly Aging and Long-Living Society.
    Sakamoto Y; Yoshitake M; Matsumura Y; Naruse H; Bando K; Hashimoto K
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Dec; 22(6):333-339. PubMed ID: 27616041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical management of aortic valve disease in the elderly: A retrospective comparative study of valve choice using propensity score analysis.
    Accola KD; Scott ML; Palmer GJ; Thompson PA; Sand ME; Suarez-Cavalier JE; Bott JN; Ebra G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):355-64; discussion 365. PubMed ID: 18751463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis.
    McClure RS; McGurk S; Cevasco M; Maloney A; Gosev I; Wiegerinck EM; Salvio G; Tokmaji G; Borstlap W; Nauta F; Cohn LH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1931-9. PubMed ID: 24521965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The St Jude Medical Trifecta aortic pericardial valve: results from a global, multicenter, prospective clinical study.
    Bavaria JE; Desai ND; Cheung A; Petracek MR; Groh MA; Borger MA; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):590-7. PubMed ID: 23477687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tissue versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in younger patients: A multicenter analysis.
    Iribarne A; Leavitt BJ; Robich MP; Sardella GL; Gelb DJ; Baribeau YR; McCullough JN; Weldner PW; Clough RA; Ross CS; Malenka DJ; DiScipio AW;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Dec; 158(6):1529-1538.e2. PubMed ID: 30929984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A retrospective comparative study of aortic valve replacement with St. Jude medical and medtronic-hall prostheses: a 20-year follow-up study.
    Anttila V; Heikkinen J; Biancari F; Oikari K; Pokela R; Lepojärvi M; Salmela E; Juvonen T
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2002 Feb; 36(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 12018768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative clinical outcomes with St. Jude Medical, Medtronic Hall and CarboMedics mechanical heart valves.
    Masters RG; Helou J; Pipe AL; Keon WJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 11380109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term outcome after biologic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in 841 patients.
    Peterseim DS; Cen YY; Cheruvu S; Landolfo K; Bashore TM; Lowe JE; Wolfe WG; Glower DD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 May; 117(5):890-7. PubMed ID: 10220680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.