These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26346987)

  • 1. Is bad living better than good death? Impact of demographic and cultural factors on health state preference.
    Jin X; Liu GG; Luo N; Li H; Guan H; Xie F
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Apr; 25(4):979-86. PubMed ID: 26346987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.
    Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The EQ-5D-5L Valuation study in Thailand.
    Pattanaphesaj J; Thavorncharoensap M; Ramos-Goñi JM; Tongsiri S; Ingsrisawang L; Teerawattananon Y
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2018 Oct; 18(5):551-558. PubMed ID: 29958008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.
    Shiroiwa T; Ikeda S; Noto S; Igarashi A; Fukuda T; Saito S; Shimozuma K
    Value Health; 2016; 19(5):648-54. PubMed ID: 27565282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Valuing Health Using Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods: Does Dimension Order Impact on Health State Values?
    Mulhern B; Shah K; Janssen MF; Longworth L; Ibbotson R
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 27021755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time Trade-Off Value Set for EQ-5D-3L Based on a Nationally Representative Chinese Population Survey.
    Zhuo L; Xu L; Ye J; Sun S; Zhang Y; Burstrom K; Chen J
    Value Health; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1330-1337. PubMed ID: 30442281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chinese time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states.
    Liu GG; Wu H; Li M; Gao C; Luo N
    Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 25128053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test-Retest Reliability of EQ-5D-5L Valuation Techniques: The Composite Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Purba FD; Hunfeld JAM; Timman R; Iskandarsyah A; Fitriana TS; Sadarjoen SS; Passchier J; Busschbach JJV
    Value Health; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1243-1249. PubMed ID: 30314626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determinants of time trade-off valuations for EQ-5D-5L health states: data from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study.
    Sayah FA; Bansback N; Bryan S; Ohinmaa A; Poissant L; Pullenayegum E; Xie F; Johnson JA
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1679-85. PubMed ID: 26659899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the Introduction of the Ranking Task in Valuation Studies Improve Data Quality and Reduce Inconsistencies? The Case of the EQ-5D-5L.
    Ramos-Goñi JM; Rand-Hendriksen K; Pinto-Prades JL
    Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 27325340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for China.
    Luo N; Liu G; Li M; Guan H; Jin X; Rand-Hendriksen K
    Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):662-669. PubMed ID: 28408009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do Chinese have similar health-state preferences? A comparison of mainland Chinese and Singaporean Chinese.
    Wang P; Li MH; Liu GG; Thumboo J; Luo N
    Eur J Health Econ; 2015 Nov; 16(8):857-63. PubMed ID: 25260384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A pilot discrete choice experiment to explore preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states.
    Norman R; Cronin P; Viney R
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Jun; 11(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 23649892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peruvian Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L: A Direct Comparison of Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Augustovski F; Belizán M; Gibbons L; Reyes N; Stolk E; Craig BM; Tejada RA
    Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):880-888. PubMed ID: 32762989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Empirical Study of Two Alternative Comparators for Use in Time Trade-Off Studies.
    Shah K; Mulhern B; Longworth L; Janssen MF
    Value Health; 2016 Jan; 19(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 26797236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The EQ-5D-5L valuation study in Korea.
    Kim SH; Ahn J; Ock M; Shin S; Park J; Luo N; Jo MW
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1845-52. PubMed ID: 26961008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Urban/rural differences in preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states: a study of a multi-ethnic region in China.
    Liao M; Luo N; Rand K; Yang Z
    Qual Life Res; 2023 Aug; 32(8):2329-2339. PubMed ID: 36944783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries.
    Bernert S; Fernández A; Haro JM; König HH; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Sevilla-Dedieu C; de Graaf R; Matschinger H; Heider D; Angermeyer MC;
    Value Health; 2009; 12(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 19490564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol.
    Oppe M; Devlin NJ; van Hout B; Krabbe PF; de Charro F
    Value Health; 2014 Jun; 17(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 24969006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Valuing EQ-5D-5L health states 'in context' using a discrete choice experiment.
    Cole A; Shah K; Mulhern B; Feng Y; Devlin N
    Eur J Health Econ; 2018 May; 19(4):595-605. PubMed ID: 28569351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.