402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26347019)
1. Fecal microbiota analysis: an overview of sample collection methods and sequencing strategies.
Thomas V; Clark J; Doré J
Future Microbiol; 2015; 10(9):1485-504. PubMed ID: 26347019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A metagenomic study of the gut microbiome in Behcet's disease.
Ye Z; Zhang N; Wu C; Zhang X; Wang Q; Huang X; Du L; Cao Q; Tang J; Zhou C; Hou S; He Y; Xu Q; Xiong X; Kijlstra A; Qin N; Yang P
Microbiome; 2018 Aug; 6(1):135. PubMed ID: 30077182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces.
Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gut Microbiota Analysis Results Are Highly Dependent on the 16S rRNA Gene Target Region, Whereas the Impact of DNA Extraction Is Minor.
Rintala A; Pietilä S; Munukka E; Eerola E; Pursiheimo JP; Laiho A; Pekkala S; Huovinen P
J Biomol Tech; 2017 Apr; 28(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 28260999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies.
Wang Z; Zolnik CP; Qiu Y; Usyk M; Wang T; Strickler HD; Isasi CR; Kaplan RC; Kurland IJ; Qi Q; Burk RD
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2018; 8():301. PubMed ID: 30234027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of methods for fecal microbiome biospecimen collection.
Dominianni C; Wu J; Hayes RB; Ahn J
BMC Microbiol; 2014 Apr; 14():103. PubMed ID: 24758293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods on Variation in Gut Metagenomics and Untargeted Metabolomics.
Guan H; Pu Y; Liu C; Lou T; Tan S; Kong M; Sun Z; Mei Z; Qi Q; Quan Z; Zhao G; Zheng Y
mSphere; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0063621. PubMed ID: 34523982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Capturing the diversity of the human gut microbiota through culture-enriched molecular profiling.
Lau JT; Whelan FJ; Herath I; Lee CH; Collins SM; Bercik P; Surette MG
Genome Med; 2016 Jul; 8(1):72. PubMed ID: 27363992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling.
Short MI; Hudson R; Besasie BD; Reveles KR; Shah DP; Nicholson S; Johnson-Pais TL; Weldon K; Lai Z; Leach RJ; Fongang B; Liss MA
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):26. PubMed ID: 33446094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of room temperature transport vials on DNA quality and phylogenetic composition of faecal microbiota of elderly adults and infants.
Hill CJ; Brown JR; Lynch DB; Jeffery IB; Ryan CA; Ross RP; Stanton C; O'Toole PW
Microbiome; 2016 May; 4(1):19. PubMed ID: 27160322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comprehensive analysis of the fecal microbiota of healthy Japanese adults reveals a new bacterial lineage associated with a phenotype characterized by a high frequency of bowel movements and a lean body type.
Oki K; Toyama M; Banno T; Chonan O; Benno Y; Watanabe K
BMC Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):284. PubMed ID: 27894251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metagenomic analysis of the impact of nitrofurantoin treatment on the human faecal microbiota.
Vervoort J; Xavier BB; Stewardson A; Coenen S; Godycki-Cwirko M; Adriaenssens N; Kowalczyk A; Lammens C; Harbarth S; Goossens H; Malhotra-Kumar S
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2015 Jul; 70(7):1989-92. PubMed ID: 25766736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative Assessment of Shotgun Metagenomics and 16S rDNA Amplicon Sequencing in the Study of Human Gut Microbiome.
Laudadio I; Fulci V; Palone F; Stronati L; Cucchiara S; Carissimi C
OMICS; 2018 Apr; 22(4):248-254. PubMed ID: 29652573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An alternative storage method for characterization of the intestinal microbiota through next generation sequencing.
Ribeiro RM; Souza-Basqueira M; Oliveira LC; Salles FC; Pereira NB; Sabino EC
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2018 Nov; 60():e77. PubMed ID: 30517247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An Improved Methodology to Overcome Key Issues in Human Fecal Metagenomic DNA Extraction.
Kumar J; Kumar M; Gupta S; Ahmed V; Bhambi M; Pandey R; Chauhan NS
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 14(6):371-378. PubMed ID: 27888152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimisation of sample storage and DNA extraction for human gut microbiota studies.
Kazantseva J; Malv E; Kaleda A; Kallastu A; Meikas A
BMC Microbiol; 2021 May; 21(1):158. PubMed ID: 34051731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rapidly Processed Stool Swabs Approximate Stool Microbiota Profiles.
Bokulich NA; Maldonado J; Kang DW; Krajmalnik-Brown R; Caporaso JG
mSphere; 2019 Apr; 4(2):. PubMed ID: 30971445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling.
Lim MY; Song EJ; Kim SH; Lee J; Nam YD
Syst Appl Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 41(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 29305057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Methods To Collect Fecal Samples for Microbiome Studies Using Whole-Genome Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing.
Byrd DA; Sinha R; Hoffman KL; Chen J; Hua X; Shi J; Chia N; Petrosino J; Vogtmann E
mSphere; 2020 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 32250964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
