170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2634718)
1. The effects of a hydrocolloid dressing on bacterial growth and the healing process of leg ulcers.
Annoni F; Rosina M; Chiurazzi D; Ceva M
Int Angiol; 1989; 8(4):224-8. PubMed ID: 2634718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Management of leg ulcers with hydrocolloid occlusive dressing.
Friedman SJ; Su WP
Arch Dermatol; 1984 Oct; 120(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 6486846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of chronic leg ulcers with a hydrocolloid dressing.
Gamborg Nielsen P; Munk Madsen S; Strömberg L
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1989; 152():1-12. PubMed ID: 2618526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.
Seeley J; Jensen JL; Hutcherson J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):39-44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10655861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A comparative study of the hydrocellular dressing Allevyn and the hydrocolloid dressing Duoderm in the local treatment of leg ulcers].
Zuccarelli F
Phlebologie; 1992; 45(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 1302331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing a foam composite to a hydrocellular foam dressing in the management of venous leg ulcers: a controlled clinical study.
Vanscheidt W; Sibbald RG; Eager CA
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2004 Nov; 50(11):42-55. PubMed ID: 15545697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Full-thickness leg ulcers: patient demographics and predictors of healing. Multi-Center Leg Ulcer Study Group.
van Rijswijk L
J Fam Pract; 1993 Jun; 36(6):625-32. PubMed ID: 8505605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing clinical efficacy of a hydrocolloid/alginate dressing on full-thickness pressure ulcers.
Barr JE; Day AL; Weaver VA; Taler GM
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Apr; 41(3):28-30, 32, 34-6 passim. PubMed ID: 7546113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hydrocolloid dressing versus tulle gauze in the treatment of abrasions in cyclists.
Hermans MH
Int J Sports Med; 1991 Dec; 12(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 1797702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses.
Alm A; Hornmark AM; Fall PA; Linder L; Bergstrand B; Ehrnebo M; Madsen SM; Setterberg G
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1989; 149():1-10. PubMed ID: 2694713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Xakellis GC; Chrischilles EA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 May; 73(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 1580775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of cadexomer iodine paste in the treatment of venous leg ulcers compared with hydrocolloid dressing and paraffin gauze dressing. Cadexomer Iodine Study Group.
Hansson C
Int J Dermatol; 1998 May; 37(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 9620490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Managing sacral pressure ulcers with hydrocolloid dressings: results of a controlled, clinical study.
Day A; Dombranski S; Farkas C; Foster C; Godin J; Moody M; Morrison M; Tamer C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Mar; 41(2):52-4, 56, 58 passim. PubMed ID: 7598778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A cost-effectiveness study of leg ulcer treatment in primary care. Comparison of saline-gauze and hydrocolloid treatment in a prospective, randomized study.
Ohlsson P; Larsson K; Lindholm C; Möller M
Scand J Prim Health Care; 1994 Dec; 12(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 7863149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.
Colwell JC; Foreman MD; Trotter JP
Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The bacteriology of chronic venous ulcers treated with occlusive hydrocolloid dressings.
Gilchrist B; Reed C
Br J Dermatol; 1989 Sep; 121(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 2803959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pressure sore management: efficacy of a moisture reactive occlusive dressing.
Yarkony GM; Kramer E; King R; Lukanc C; Carle TV
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1984 Oct; 65(10):597-600. PubMed ID: 6487064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Full-thickness pressure ulcers: patient and wound healing characteristics.
van Rijswijk L
Decubitus; 1993 Jan; 6(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 8427640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
