These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26348070)

  • 1. Default processing of event sequences.
    Hymel A; Levin DT; Baker LJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Feb; 42(2):235-46. PubMed ID: 26348070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention reorganizes as structure is detected in dynamic action.
    Hard BM; Meyer M; Baldwin D
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 30168092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Same action, different level: Descriptions of perceived or predicted actions depend on preceding temporal gaps in event streams.
    Garsoffky B; Schwan S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1868-1880. PubMed ID: 32463257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does oculomotor readiness mediate exogenous capture of visual attention?
    MacLean GH; Klein RM; Hilchey MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1260-70. PubMed ID: 26076176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicted action consequences are perceptually facilitated before cancellation.
    Yon D; Press C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1073-1083. PubMed ID: 28263639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the role of motor regulation in figural fluency: partialing variance in the Ruff Figural fluency test.
    Kraybill ML; Suchy Y
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Nov; 30(8):903-12. PubMed ID: 18608686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Target-directed visual attention is a prerequisite for action-specific perception.
    Cañal-Bruland R; Zhu FF; der Kamp Jv; Masters RS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 21272839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention rapidly reorganizes to naturally occurring structure in a novel activity sequence.
    Kosie JE; Baldwin D
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():31-44. PubMed ID: 30216898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unconscious processing of body actions primes subsequent action perception but not motor execution.
    Mele S; Mattiassi AD; Urgesi C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):1940-62. PubMed ID: 24865158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensory-motor interference abolishes repetition priming for observed actions, but not for action-related verbs.
    Busiello M; Costantini M; Galati G; Committeri G
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Apr; 492(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 21281697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the road to somewhere: Brain potentials reflect language effects on motion event perception.
    Flecken M; Athanasopoulos P; Kuipers JR; Thierry G
    Cognition; 2015 Aug; 141():41-51. PubMed ID: 25917431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex.
    Scalf PE; Dux PE; Marois R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2593-604. PubMed ID: 21281093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Isolating the neural mechanisms of interference during continuous multisensory dual-task performance.
    Kasper RW; Cecotti H; Touryan J; Eckstein MP; Giesbrecht B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):476-89. PubMed ID: 24047391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expectation violations in sensorimotor sequences: shifting from LTM-based attentional selection to visual search.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():45-59. PubMed ID: 25708482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cannabis with high δ9-THC contents affects perception and visual selective attention acutely: an event-related potential study.
    Böcker KB; Gerritsen J; Hunault CC; Kruidenier M; Mensinga TT; Kenemans JL
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2010 Jul; 96(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 20417659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics of sustaining attention in a gradual-onset continuous performance task.
    Jun J; Remington RW; Koutstaal W; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):386-401. PubMed ID: 30730177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relations among visual strategies, force fluctuations, and attention during a force-matching task.
    Huddleston W; Keenan K; Ernest B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Dec; 117(3):775-800. PubMed ID: 24665797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of perceptual-motor variability on the perception of action boundaries for reaching.
    Lin LPY; McLatchie NM; Linkenauger SA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):474-488. PubMed ID: 32191110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual guidance modulates hemispheric asymmetries during an interlimb coordination task.
    Woolley DG; Wenderoth N; Heuninckx S; Zhang X; Callaert D; Swinnen SP
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 50(4):1566-77. PubMed ID: 20079443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal dynamics of action perception: differences on ERP evoked by object-related and non-object-related actions.
    Wamain Y; Pluciennicka E; Kalénine S
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():249-58. PubMed ID: 25204513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.