These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26348166)

  • 1. Pain Associated With Cesarean Delivery Skin Closure: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Mackeen AD; Khalifeh A; Fleisher J; Han C; Leiby B; Berghella V
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 126(4):702-707. PubMed ID: 26348166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Figueroa D; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Garner R; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Hauth J; Tita AT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
    Rodel RL; Gray KM; Quiner TE; Bodea Braescu A; Gerkin R; Perlow JH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mackeen AD; Khalifeh A; Fleisher J; Vogell A; Han C; Sendecki J; Pettker C; Leiby BE; Baxter JK; Sfakianaki A; Berghella V
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):1169-1175. PubMed ID: 24807325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suture Compared With Staples for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mackeen AD; Sullivan MV; Schuster M; Berghella V
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 35852281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
    Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tuuli MG; Rampersad RM; Carbone JF; Stamilio D; Macones GA; Odibo AO
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):682-690. PubMed ID: 21343772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subcuticular suture compared with staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Aabakke AJM; Krebs L; Pipper CB; Secher NJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 122(4):878-884. PubMed ID: 24084548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure?
    Cooper SM; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Tita ATN
    Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Staples versus subcuticular suture for cesarean skin closure in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Han D; Feng L; Xu L; Li C; Zhang Q
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct; 51(8):102420. PubMed ID: 35688324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
    Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):CD003577. PubMed ID: 23152219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
    Sharma C; Verma A; Soni A; Thusoo M; Mahajan VK; Verma S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Type for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Buresch AM; Van Arsdale A; Ferzli M; Sahasrabudhe N; Sun M; Bernstein J; Bernstein PS; Ngai IM; Garry DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 130(3):521-526. PubMed ID: 28796687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skin closure of pfannenstiel incision with dermabond, staples, or suture during cesarean delivery: experience of a single attending.
    Siddiqui DS; Lacuna EM; Chen HY; Chauhan SP
    Am J Perinatol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 22875661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Knotless Barbed versus Conventional Suture for Closure of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Raischer HB; Massalha M; Iskander R; Izhaki I; Salim R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 29(7):832-839. PubMed ID: 35533955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Clay FS; Walsh CA; Walsh SR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 204(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 21195384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
    Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.