BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26348945)

  • 1. Revamp biotech rules, says White House.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2015 Sep; 33(9):894. PubMed ID: 26348945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. US animal biotech regulations "may not be adequate".
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):959. PubMed ID: 12355099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
    Vasil IK
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution.
    Hoffman DE
    Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concern about Japan's unclear biotech regulations.
    Watanabe KN
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):689. PubMed ID: 12610594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinton's cloning ban may threaten genetic research.
    Hoyle R
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jul; 15(7):600. PubMed ID: 9219249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. US bioethicists say continue human cloning moratorium.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jul; 15(7):609. PubMed ID: 9219252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. US Presidential transition prompts biotech policy frenzy.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 11231515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How Should Risk-Based Regulation Reflect Current Public Opinion?
    Pollock CJ
    Trends Biotechnol; 2016 Aug; 34(8):604-605. PubMed ID: 27266813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. USDA scrutinizes GM organism regulations.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 14990936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. US academia held accountable for GM products.
    Powell K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):720-1. PubMed ID: 12833077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Action needed to harmonize regulation of low-level presence of biotech traits.
    Krueger R; Le Buanec B
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 18259165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Who's afraid of biotechnology?
    Tait J
    New Sci; 1992 Jun; 134(1827):49. PubMed ID: 16044585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genes out of the bottle.
    New Repub; 2000 Feb; 222(9):9. PubMed ID: 14582498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Putting Cartagena into practice.
    Watanabe KN; Taeb M; Okusu H
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Oct; 22(10):1207-8. PubMed ID: 15470448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Getting serious about IVF.
    Wolfson A
    New Atlantis; 2004; 5():78-84. PubMed ID: 15586959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. White House bill would ban human cloning.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6634):644. PubMed ID: 9192876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recipe for disaster.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):465. PubMed ID: 12721554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rejection of GM crops is not a failure for science.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2015 Sep; 525(7567):7. PubMed ID: 26333435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Swiss biotech. Government shoots down GM plant trials.
    Weiss G
    Science; 2001 Dec; 294(5549):2067-9. PubMed ID: 11739923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.