159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26349043)
1. Influence of Footwear Type on Barbell Back Squat Using 50, 70, and 90% of One Repetition Maximum: A Biomechanical Analysis.
Whitting JW; Meir RA; Crowley-McHattan ZJ; Holding RC
J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1085-92. PubMed ID: 26349043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Kinematic changes using weightlifting shoes on barbell back squat.
Sato K; Fortenbaugh D; Hydock DS
J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Jan; 26(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 22201687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of different footwear on 3-D kinematics and muscle activation during the barbell back squat in males.
Sinclair J; McCarthy D; Bentley I; Hurst HT; Atkins S
Eur J Sport Sci; 2015; 15(7):583-90. PubMed ID: 25331484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of squatting footwear on three-dimensional lower limb and spine kinetics.
Southwell DJ; Petersen SA; Beach TA; Graham RB
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2016 Dec; 31():111-118. PubMed ID: 27770687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of weightlifting shoes on the kinetics and kinematics of the back squat.
Legg HS; Glaister M; Cleather DJ; Goodwin JE
J Sports Sci; 2017 Mar; 35(5):508-515. PubMed ID: 27096286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Heel-Raised Foot Posture Does Not Affect Trunk and Lower Extremity Biomechanics During a Barbell Back Squat in Recreational Weight lifters.
Lee SP; Gillis CB; Ibarra JJ; Oldroyd DF; Zane RS
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Mar; 33(3):606-614. PubMed ID: 30789547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of elevating the heels on spinal kinematics and kinetics during the back squat in trained and novice weight trainers.
Sayers MGL; Bachem C; Schütz P; Taylor WR; List R; Lorenzetti S; Nasab SHH
J Sports Sci; 2020 May; 38(9):1000-1008. PubMed ID: 32183616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Biomechanical Comparison Between the Safety-Squat Bar and Traditional Barbell Back Squat.
Johansson DG; Marchetti PH; Stecyk SD; Flanagan SP
J Strength Cond Res; 2024 May; 38(5):825-834. PubMed ID: 38595263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Kinematic variations in the barbell back squat under different footwear conditions in female college athletes.
Arlettaz ME; Dorsch LN; Sganga M; Booth ND; Farabello JS
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2024 Mar; 64(3):287-292. PubMed ID: 38015479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of squat depth and barbell load on relative muscular effort in squatting.
Bryanton MA; Kennedy MD; Carey JP; Chiu LZ
J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Oct; 26(10):2820-8. PubMed ID: 22797000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shod vs. Barefoot Effects on Force and Power Development During a Conventional Deadlift.
Hammer ME; Meir RA; Whitting JW; Crowley-McHattan ZJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Jun; 32(6):1525-1530. PubMed ID: 29016477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Kinematic Differences Between the Front and Back Squat and Conventional and Sumo Deadlift.
Kasovic J; Martin B; Fahs CA
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Dec; 33(12):3213-3219. PubMed ID: 31567791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Preferred Movement Path Paradigm: Influence of Running Shoes on Joint Movement.
Nigg BM; Vienneau J; Smith AC; Trudeau MB; Mohr M; Nigg SR
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Aug; 49(8):1641-1648. PubMed ID: 28277405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimal loading range for the development of peak power output in the hexagonal barbell jump squat.
Turner TS; Tobin DP; Delahunt E
J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Jun; 29(6):1627-32. PubMed ID: 25486301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Ankle Mobility and Segment Ratios on Trunk Lean in the Barbell Back Squat.
Fuglsang EI; Telling AS; Sørensen H
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Nov; 31(11):3024-3033. PubMed ID: 28301442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A biomechanical analysis of straight and hexagonal barbell deadlifts using submaximal loads.
Swinton PA; Stewart A; Agouris I; Keogh JW; Lloyd R
J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2000-9. PubMed ID: 21659894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of supportive equipment on force, velocity, and power in the squat.
Blatnik JA; Skinner JW; McBride JM
J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Dec; 26(12):3204-8. PubMed ID: 22996018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of variable resistance loading on subsequent free weight maximal back squat performance.
Mina MA; Blazevich AJ; Giakas G; Kay AD
J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Oct; 28(10):2988-95. PubMed ID: 24796978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of kinematics and electromyography in the last repetition during different maximum repetition sets in the barbell back squat.
Falch HN; Hegdahl Gundersen A; Larsen S; Estifanos Haugen M; van den Tillaar R
PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16865. PubMed ID: 38313010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Kinematic and sEMG Analysis of the Back Squat at Different Intensities With and Without Knee Wraps.
Gomes WA; Brown LE; Soares EG; da Silva JJ; de O Silva FH; Serpa ÉP; Corrêa DA; Vilela Junior Gde B; Lopes CR; Marchetti PH
J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2482-7. PubMed ID: 25763519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
