These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26349907)

  • 1. Diagnostic prediction models for suspected pulmonary embolism: systematic review and independent external validation in primary care.
    Hendriksen JM; Geersing GJ; Lucassen WA; Erkens PM; Stoffers HE; van Weert HC; Büller HR; Hoes AW; Moons KG
    BMJ; 2015 Sep; 351():h4438. PubMed ID: 26349907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism in Primary Care: Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of "Gestalt" and the Wells Rule.
    Hendriksen JM; Lucassen WA; Erkens PM; Stoffers HE; van Weert HC; Büller HR; Hoes AW; Moons KG; Geersing GJ
    Ann Fam Med; 2016 May; 14(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 27184993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of 4 clinical decision rules in the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study.
    Douma RA; Mos IC; Erkens PM; Nizet TA; Durian MF; Hovens MM; van Houten AA; Hofstee HM; Klok FA; ten Cate H; Ullmann EF; Büller HR; Kamphuisen PW; Huisman MV;
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 154(11):709-18. PubMed ID: 21646554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The original and simplified Wells rules and age-adjusted D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
    van Es N; Kraaijpoel N; Klok FA; Huisman MV; Den Exter PL; Mos IC; Galipienzo J; Büller HR; Bossuyt PM
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Apr; 15(4):678-684. PubMed ID: 28106338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism: prospective validation of the simplified Geneva score.
    Robert-Ebadi H; Mostaguir K; Hovens MM; Kare M; Verschuren F; Girard P; Huisman MV; Moustafa F; Kamphuisen PW; Buller HR; Righini M; Le Gal G
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Sep; 15(9):1764-1769. PubMed ID: 28688113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of the simplified Wells and revised Geneva scores to exclude pulmonary embolism in femur fracture patients.
    Kim YJ; Choi DH; Lee ES; Ryoo SM; Ahn S; Sohn CH; Seo DW; Lim KS; Kim WY
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1131-1135. PubMed ID: 28390832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of the Wells clinical prediction rule for pulmonary embolism in older ambulatory adults.
    Schouten HJ; Geersing GJ; Oudega R; van Delden JJ; Moons KG; Koek HL
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2014 Nov; 62(11):2136-41. PubMed ID: 25366538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Positive Pulmonary Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients with Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Clinical Prediction Rules, Thromboembolic Risk Factors, and Implications for Appropriate Use.
    Vongchaiudomchoke T; Boonyasirinant T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Jan; 99(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 27455821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-dependent diagnostic accuracy of clinical scoring systems and D-dimer levels in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA).
    Nagel SN; Steffen IG; Schwartz S; Hamm B; Elgeti T
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4563-4571. PubMed ID: 30783786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Values of the Wells and revised Geneva scores combined with D-dimer in diagnosing elderly pulmonary embolism patients.
    Guo DJ; Zhao C; Zou YD; Huang XH; Hu JM; Guo L
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Apr; 128(8):1052-7. PubMed ID: 25881599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Wells and Revised Geneva Rule to Assess Pretest Probability of Pulmonary Embolism in High-Risk Hospitalized Elderly Adults.
    Di Marca S; Cilia C; Campagna A; D'Arrigo G; Abd ElHafeez S; Tripepi G; Puccia G; Pisano M; Mastrosimone G; Terranova V; Cardella A; Buonacera A; Stancanelli B; Zoccali C; Malatino L
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2015 Jun; 63(6):1091-7. PubMed ID: 26032745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism using the Wells rule and qualitative D-dimer testing in primary care: prospective cohort study.
    Geersing GJ; Erkens PM; Lucassen WA; Büller HR; Cate HT; Hoes AW; Moons KG; Prins MH; Oudega R; van Weert HC; Stoffers HE
    BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6564. PubMed ID: 23036917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.
    Righini M; Van Es J; Den Exter PL; Roy PM; Verschuren F; Ghuysen A; Rutschmann OT; Sanchez O; Jaffrelot M; Trinh-Duc A; Le Gall C; Moustafa F; Principe A; Van Houten AA; Ten Wolde M; Douma RA; Hazelaar G; Erkens PM; Van Kralingen KW; Grootenboers MJ; Durian MF; Cheung YW; Meyer G; Bounameaux H; Huisman MV; Kamphuisen PW; Le Gal G
    JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(11):1117-24. PubMed ID: 24643601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the unstructured clinician gestalt, the wells score, and the revised Geneva score to estimate pretest probability for suspected pulmonary embolism.
    Penaloza A; Verschuren F; Meyer G; Quentin-Georget S; Soulie C; Thys F; Roy PM
    Ann Emerg Med; 2013 Aug; 62(2):117-124.e2. PubMed ID: 23433653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are the Wells Score and the Revised Geneva Score valuable for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy?
    Touhami O; Marzouk SB; Bennasr L; Touaibia M; Souli I; Felfel MA; Kehila M; Channoufi MB; Magherbi HE
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Feb; 221():166-171. PubMed ID: 29310042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity of four clinical prediction scores for pulmonary embolism in a sub-Saharan African setting: a protocol for a Cameroonian multicentre cross-sectional study.
    Esiéné A; Owono Etoundi P; Tochie JN; Mbengono Metogo JA; Ze Minkande J
    BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e031322. PubMed ID: 31619430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The combination of four different clinical decision rules and an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off increases the number of patients in whom acute pulmonary embolism can safely be excluded.
    van Es J; Mos I; Douma R; Erkens P; Durian M; Nizet T; van Houten A; Hofstee H; ten Cate H; Ullmann E; Büller H; Huisman M; Kamphuisen PW
    Thromb Haemost; 2012 Jan; 107(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 22072293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simplification of the revised Geneva score for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.
    Klok FA; Mos IC; Nijkeuter M; Righini M; Perrier A; Le Gal G; Huisman MV
    Arch Intern Med; 2008 Oct; 168(19):2131-6. PubMed ID: 18955643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Wells score with the revised Geneva score for assessing suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shen JH; Chen HL; Chen JR; Xing JL; Gu P; Zhu BF
    J Thromb Thrombolysis; 2016 Apr; 41(3):482-92. PubMed ID: 26178041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical decision rules for excluding pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.
    Lucassen W; Geersing GJ; Erkens PM; Reitsma JB; Moons KG; Büller H; van Weert HC
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(7):448-60. PubMed ID: 21969343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.