These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2635120)

  • 1. Accuracy of radiographic caries diagnosis using different X-ray generators.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 May; 18(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 2635120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of tube voltage on radiographic diagnosis of caries in premolars and molars.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 1767370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of a new processor containing a self-cleaning synthetic-web transport mechanism.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 8508937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of proximal caries.
    Akkaya N; Kansu O; Kansu H; Cagirankaya LB; Arslan U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 16618850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of radiographic caries diagnosis at different kilovoltages and two film speeds.
    Svenson B; Gröndahl HG; Petersson A; Olving A
    Swed Dent J; 1985; 9(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 3859029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and laboratory radiographic caries diagnosis. A study of the same teeth.
    Hintze H; Wenze A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jun; 25(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 9084258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of tube potential setting and dose on the visibility of lesions in intraoral radiography.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 17403883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proximal caries detection: Sirona Sidexis versus Kodak Ektaspeed Plus.
    Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Caplan D
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15779222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of technical parameters on image perception using two types of dental radiographs.
    Nielsen PM; Weber HP; zen Ruffinen S; Brecx M; Joss A; Lang NP
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1989; 99(7):777-81. PubMed ID: 2692154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of film fog on radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Svenson B; Gröndahl HG; Lindvall AM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 Aug; 19(3):105-8. PubMed ID: 2088781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of image quality on radiographic diagnosis of approximal caries.
    Svenson B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 74():1-62. PubMed ID: 2035145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Ohki M; Okano T; Nakamura T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 7835507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of number of surfaces and observers on statistical power in a multiobserver ROC radiographic caries detection study.
    Hintze H; Frydenberg M; Wenzel A
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 12740544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of different developing solutions and developing times on radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 Nov; 19(4):157-60. PubMed ID: 2097224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of a new dental X-ray film, Agfa Gevaert Dentus M4, with Kodak Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed dental X-ray films.
    Svenson B; Lindvall AM; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8508944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of conventional intra-oral radiography and computer imaging techniques for the detection of proximal surface dental caries.
    Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Aug; 21(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 1397467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Martinez TS; Matteson SR; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1397457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographic caries diagnosis. A study of caries progression and observer performance.
    Gröndahl HG
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1979; (3):1-32. PubMed ID: 293056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of observer performance in radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Gröndahl HG
    Swed Dent J; 1979; 3(4):101-7. PubMed ID: 291131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of the direct magnification technique in dental radiology.
    Wichmann MG; von Brenndorff AI
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 10455390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.