These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26352272)
1. [Shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery or percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower pole renal stones?]. Rojas A; Gallegos H; Salvadó JA Medwave; 2015 Sep; 15 Suppl 2():e6254. PubMed ID: 26352272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones. Donaldson JF; Lardas M; Scrimgeour D; Stewart F; MacLennan S; Lam TB; McClinton S Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):612-6. PubMed ID: 25449204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones Less Than 2 cm in Maximum Diameter. Kallidonis P; Ntasiotis P; Somani B; Adamou C; Emiliani E; Knoll T; Skolarikos A; Tailly T J Urol; 2020 Sep; 204(3):427-433. PubMed ID: 32150506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Setthawong V; Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Pattanittum P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Aug; 8(8):CD007044. PubMed ID: 37526261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience. Kumar A; Kumar N; Vasudeva P; Kumar Jha S; Kumar R; Singh H J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):160-4. PubMed ID: 25066869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Zhang W; Zhou T; Wu T; Gao X; Peng Y; Xu C; Chen Q; Song R; Sun Y J Endourol; 2015 Jul; 29(7):745-59. PubMed ID: 25531986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Setthawong V; Laopaiboon M Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007044. PubMed ID: 19821393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy. Kruck S; Anastasiadis AG; Herrmann TR; Walcher U; Abdelhafez MF; Nicklas AP; Hölzle L; Schilling D; Bedke J; Stenzl A; Nagele U World J Urol; 2013 Dec; 31(6):1555-61. PubMed ID: 23064981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Junbo L; Yugen L; Guo J; Jing H; Ruichao Y; Tao W Urol J; 2019 May; 16(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 30604405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones. Resorlu B; Unsal A; Ziypak T; Diri A; Atis G; Guven S; Sancaktutar AA; Tepeler A; Bozkurt OF; Oztuna D World J Urol; 2013 Dec; 31(6):1581-6. PubMed ID: 23179732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. reply letter to Reply letter to: Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Cubuk A; Özkaptan O; Sahan A Urol J; 2021 Jan; 18(3):351-352. PubMed ID: 33495987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, shock wave lithotripsy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi 10-20 mm. Ozturk U; Sener NC; Goktug HN; Nalbant I; Gucuk A; Imamoglu MA Urol Int; 2013; 91(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 23816573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Large Renal Stones in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Saad KS; Youssif ME; Al Islam Nafis Hamdy S; Fahmy A; El Din Hanno AG; El-Nahas AR J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1716-20. PubMed ID: 26165587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones]. Schmidt S; Miernik A Urologe A; 2015 Sep; 54(9):1283-6. PubMed ID: 26223955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Does previous extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy affect the performance and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Yuruk E; Tefekli A; Sari E; Karadag MA; Tepeler A; Binbay M; Muslumanoglu AY J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):663-7. PubMed ID: 19091339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm. El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multimodality treatment of complex renal calculi. Smith JJ; Hollowell JG; Roth RA J Urol; 1990 May; 143(5):891-4. PubMed ID: 2329599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive surgical treatment for kidney stone disease. Rodríguez D; Sacco DE Adv Chronic Kidney Dis; 2015 Jul; 22(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 26088070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for moderate sized kidney stones. Deem S; Defade B; Modak A; Emmett M; Martinez F; Davalos J Urology; 2011 Oct; 78(4):739-43. PubMed ID: 21664653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment for renal stones 1-2 cm: a meta-analysis. Zheng C; Yang H; Luo J; Xiong B; Wang H; Jiang Q Urolithiasis; 2015 Nov; 43(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 26211003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]