These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2635261)

  • 1. The objective assessment of physical activity in an occupationally active group.
    Washburn RA; Cook TC; LaPorte RE
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 1989 Sep; 29(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 2635261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of activity levels using the Caltrac accelerometer and five questionnaires.
    Miller DJ; Freedson PS; Kline GM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Mar; 26(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 8183104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ability of the Caltrac accelerometer to assess daily physical activity levels.
    Richardson MT; Leon AS; Jacobs DR; Ainsworth BE; Serfass R
    J Cardiopulm Rehabil; 1995; 15(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 8542513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Caltrac accelerometer as a physical activity monitor for school-age children.
    Sallis JF; Buono MJ; Roby JJ; Carlson D; Nelson JA
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1990 Oct; 22(5):698-703. PubMed ID: 2233210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stability and convergent validity of three physical activity assessments.
    Allor KM; Pivarnik JM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2001 Apr; 33(4):671-6. PubMed ID: 11283447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting Caltrac and Calcount accelerometer output.
    Balogun JA; Amusa LO; Onyewadume IU
    Phys Ther; 1988 Oct; 68(10):1500-4. PubMed ID: 3174831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Caltrac versus calorimeter determination of 24-h energy expenditure in female children and adolescents.
    Bray MS; Wong WW; Morrow JR; Butte NF; Pivarnik JM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Dec; 26(12):1524-30. PubMed ID: 7869888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Walking and running energy expenditure estimated by Caltrac and indirect calorimetry.
    Haymes EM; Byrnes WC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Dec; 25(12):1365-9. PubMed ID: 8107543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A validation of a physical activity monitor for young and older adults.
    Nichols JF; Patterson P; Early T
    Can J Sport Sci; 1992 Dec; 17(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 1330268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Familial aggregation in physical activity.
    Freedson PS; Evenson S
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1991 Dec; 62(4):384-9. PubMed ID: 1780560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of energy expenditure in normal-weight and overweight women using the Caltrac Personal Activity Computer.
    Rutter S
    Int J Eat Disord; 1994 Jan; 15(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 8124325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and reliability of the Caltrac accelerometer for estimating energy expenditure.
    Pambianco G; Wing RR; Robertson R
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1990 Dec; 22(6):858-62. PubMed ID: 2287266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective study of the reliability and convergent validity of three physical activity measures in a field research trial.
    Williams E; Klesges RC; Hanson CL; Eck LH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1989; 42(12):1161-70. PubMed ID: 2585007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The validity of a portable accelerometer for estimating energy expenditure in bicycle riding.
    Hunter GR; Montoye HJ; Webster JG; Demment R; Ji LL; Ng A
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 1989 Sep; 29(3):218-22. PubMed ID: 2635251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the CSA accelerometer for assessing children's physical activity.
    Janz KF
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Mar; 26(3):369-75. PubMed ID: 8183103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The assessment of physical activity in older women: analysis of the interrelationship and reliability of activity monitoring, activity surveys, and caloric intake.
    LaPorte RE; Black-Sandler R; Cauley JA; Link M; Bayles C; Marks B
    J Gerontol; 1983 Jul; 38(4):394-7. PubMed ID: 6863852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A validation of two motion sensors in the prediction of child and adult physical activity levels.
    Klesges RC; Klesges LM; Swenson AM; Pheley AM
    Am J Epidemiol; 1985 Sep; 122(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 4025290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The validity of the Tritrac-R3D Activity Monitor for the assessment of physical activity in children.
    Welk GJ; Corbin CB
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1995 Sep; 66(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 7481081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects.
    LaPorte RE; Montoye HJ; Caspersen CJ
    Public Health Rep; 1985; 100(2):131-46. PubMed ID: 3920712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technical reliability of the CSA activity monitor: The EarlyBird Study.
    Metcalf BS; Curnow JS; Evans C; Voss LD; Wilkin TJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Sep; 34(9):1533-7. PubMed ID: 12218751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.