1030 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26352747)
1. Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.
Weber C; Giannadakis C; Rao V; Jakola AS; Nerland U; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S; Solheim O
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E78-83. PubMed ID: 26352747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Individuals Aged 80 and Older: A Multicenter Observational Study.
Giannadakis C; Solheim O; Jakola AS; Nordseth T; Gulati AM; Nerland US; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2016 Oct; 64(10):2011-2018. PubMed ID: 27611928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of pain sensitivity on surgical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kim HJ; Lee JI; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Ruscheweyh R; Kang SS; Yeom JS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Feb; 40(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 25384051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).
Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Romild UK; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28327114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine learning-based preoperative predictive analytics for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Siccoli A; de Wispelaere MP; Schröder ML; Staartjes VE
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E5. PubMed ID: 31042660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is the presence of foraminal stenosis associated with outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with posterior microsurgical decompression.
Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Anvar M; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Aug; 165(8):2121-2129. PubMed ID: 37407851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are There Differences Between Patients with Extreme Stenosis and Non-extreme Stenosis in Terms of Pain, Function or Complications After Spinal Decompression Using a Tubular Retractor System?
Kulkarni AG; Das S; Kunder TS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 478(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 31633587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of catastrophising on treatment outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kim HJ; Park JW; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1546-54. PubMed ID: 26530659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does Obesity Affect Outcomes After Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis? A Multicenter, Observational, Registry-Based Study.
Giannadakis C; Nerland US; Solheim O; Jakola AS; Gulati M; Weber C; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S
World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1227-34. PubMed ID: 26100169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do patients with lumbar spinal stenosis benefit from decompression of levels with adjacent moderate stenosis? A prospective cohort study from the NORDSTEN study.
Tronstad S; Haug KJ; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Brisby H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Brox JI; Grundnes O; Franssen E; Indrekvam K; Solberg T; Hermansen E
Spine J; 2024 Jun; 24(6):1015-1021. PubMed ID: 38266826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does surgical technique influence clinical outcome after lumbar spinal stenosis decompression? A comparative effectiveness study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
Hermansen E; Romild UK; Austevoll IM; Solberg T; Storheim K; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):420-427. PubMed ID: 27262561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis using Navicath for the management of chronic pain due to lumbosacral disc herniation.
Lee JH; Lee SH
Pain Physician; 2012; 15(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 22622905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reducing surgical levels by paraspinal mapping and diffusion tensor imaging techniques in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Chen HB; Wan Q; Xu QF; Chen Y; Bai B
J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Apr; 11(1):47. PubMed ID: 27113931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25840041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comprehensive study of back and leg pain improvements after adult spinal deformity surgery: analysis of 421 patients with 2-year follow-up and of the impact of the surgery on treatment satisfaction.
Scheer JK; Smith JS; Clark AJ; Lafage V; Kim HJ; Rolston JD; Eastlack R; Hart RA; Protopsaltis TS; Kelly MP; Kebaish K; Gupta M; Klineberg E; Hostin R; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Ames CP;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):540-53. PubMed ID: 25700238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of the Optimal Cutoff Values for Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire Scores and the Oswestry Disability Index for Favorable Surgical Outcomes in Subjects With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Kim HJ; Park JW; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Kang SS; Yeom JS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(20):E1110-6. PubMed ID: 26076437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcome after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with insignificant lower extremity pain. A prospective cohort study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery.
Hermansen E; Myklebust TÅ; Austevoll IM; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 30669998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
