These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26353078)

  • 1. Knowledge of Native Protein-Protein Interfaces Is Sufficient To Construct Predictive Models for the Selection of Binding Candidates.
    Popov P; Grudinin S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Oct; 55(10):2242-55. PubMed ID: 26353078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Convex-PL: a novel knowledge-based potential for protein-ligand interactions deduced from structural databases using convex optimization.
    Kadukova M; Grudinin S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Oct; 31(10):943-958. PubMed ID: 28921375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function for protein-protein recognition.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2008 Aug; 72(2):557-79. PubMed ID: 18247354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting the native ligand orientation by interfacial rigidity: SiteInterlock.
    Raschka S; Bemister-Buffington J; Kuhn LA
    Proteins; 2016 Dec; 84(12):1888-1901. PubMed ID: 27699847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.
    Mooij WT; Verdonk ML
    Proteins; 2005 Nov; 61(2):272-87. PubMed ID: 16106379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction.
    Velec HF; Gohlke H; Klebe G
    J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(20):6296-303. PubMed ID: 16190756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
    Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
    Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.
    Ferrara P; Gohlke H; Price DJ; Klebe G; Brooks CL
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jun; 47(12):3032-47. PubMed ID: 15163185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving CAPRI predictions: optimized desolvation for rigid-body docking.
    Fernández-Recio J; Abagyan R; Totrov M
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 15981266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Knowledge-based scoring functions in drug design: 2. Can the knowledge base be enriched?
    Shen Q; Xiong B; Zheng M; Luo X; Luo C; Liu X; Du Y; Li J; Zhu W; Shen J; Jiang H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):386-97. PubMed ID: 21192670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities using multiple instance learning.
    Teramoto R; Kashima H
    J Mol Graph Model; 2010 Nov; 29(3):492-7. PubMed ID: 20965757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions: II. Validation of the scoring function.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    J Comput Chem; 2006 Nov; 27(15):1876-82. PubMed ID: 16983671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complementarity of hydrophobic properties in ATP-protein binding: a new criterion to rank docking solutions.
    Pyrkov TV; Kosinsky YA; Arseniev AS; Priestle JP; Jacoby E; Efremov RG
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):388-98. PubMed ID: 17094116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. H-bond network optimization in protein-protein complexes: are all-atom force field scores enough?
    Masone D; Vaca IC; Pons C; Recio JF; Guallar V
    Proteins; 2012 Mar; 80(3):818-24. PubMed ID: 22113891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexible relaxation of rigid-body docking solutions.
    Król M; Tournier AL; Bates PA
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17397060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural mining: self-consistent design on flexible protein-peptide docking and transferable binding affinity potential.
    Liu Z; Dominy BN; Shakhnovich EI
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Jul; 126(27):8515-28. PubMed ID: 15238009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scoring a diverse set of high-quality docked conformations: a metascore based on electrostatic and desolvation interactions.
    Camacho CJ; Ma H; Champ PC
    Proteins; 2006 Jun; 63(4):868-77. PubMed ID: 16506242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complex-type-dependent scoring functions in protein-protein docking.
    Li CH; Ma XH; Shen LZ; Chang S; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Biophys Chem; 2007 Aug; 129(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17540496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.