Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26353870)

  • 1. Reasons for non-participation in the Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study.
    Bradley DT; Treanor C; McMullan C; Owen T; Graham A; Anderson D
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008266. PubMed ID: 26353870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concerns, perceived need and competing priorities: a qualitative exploration of decision-making and non-participation in a population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme to prevent colorectal cancer.
    Hall N; Birt L; Rees CJ; Walter FM; Elliot S; Ritchie M; Weller D; Rubin G
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e012304. PubMed ID: 27836872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study.
    Palmer CK; Thomas MC; von Wagner C; Raine R
    Br J Cancer; 2014 Apr; 110(7):1705-11. PubMed ID: 24619071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.
    Dressler J; Johnsen AT; Madsen LJ; Rasmussen M; Jorgensen LN
    Public Health; 2021 Jan; 190():67-74. PubMed ID: 33360029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of gender on decisions to participate in faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study.
    Clarke N; Gallagher P; Kearney PM; McNamara D; Sharp L
    Psychooncology; 2016 Dec; 25(12):1456-1462. PubMed ID: 26864167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. To participate or not? Giving voice to gender and socio-economic differences in colorectal cancer screening programmes.
    Molina-Barceló A; Salas Trejo D; Peiró-Pérez R; Málaga López A
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2011 Sep; 20(5):669-78. PubMed ID: 21771129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT)-based colorectal cancer screening trends and predictors of non-use: findings from the South Australian setting and implications for increasing FOBT uptake.
    Todorov K; Wilson C; Sharplin G; Corsini N
    Aust Health Rev; 2018 Feb; 42(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 28248632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why colorectal screening fails to achieve the uptake rates of breast and cervical cancer screening: a comparative qualitative study.
    Kotzur M; McCowan C; Macdonald S; Wyke S; Gatting L; Campbell C; Weller D; Crighton E; Steele RJC; Robb KA
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2020 Jun; 29(6):482-490. PubMed ID: 31879320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive ability and personality as predictors of participation in a national colorectal cancer screening programme: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.
    Gale CR; Deary IJ; Wardle J; Zaninotto P; Batty GD
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2015 Jun; 69(6):530-5. PubMed ID: 25648994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beliefs and Attitudes to Bowel Cancer Screening in Patients with CKD: A Semistructured Interview Study.
    James LJ; Wong G; Craig JC; Ju A; Williams N; Lim WH; Cross N; Tong A
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2017 Apr; 12(4):568-576. PubMed ID: 28153937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring the decision to participate in the National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
    Ekberg M; Callender M; Hamer H; Rogers S
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2014 Sep; 23(5):391-7. PubMed ID: 24418799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A qualitative investigation of factors influencing participation in bowel screening in New South Wales.
    Dawson G; Crane M; Lyons C; Burnham A; Bowman T; Travaglia J
    Health Promot J Austr; 2016 Apr; 27(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 26859797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increasing bowel cancer screening participation: integrating population-wide, primary care and more targeted approaches.
    Lofti-Jam KL; O'Reilly CL; Feng CS; Wakefield MA; Durkin S; Broun KH
    Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Barriers to flexible sigmoidoscopy colorectal cancer screening in low uptake socio-demographic groups: A systematic review.
    Travis E; Ashley L; Pownall M; O'Connor DB
    Psychooncology; 2020 Aug; 29(8):1237-1247. PubMed ID: 32539187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Cross-sectional Study of Knowledge, Attitude and Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening among Cancer Survivors.
    Huang Y; Soon YY; Ngo LP; Dina Ee YH; Tai BC; Wong HC; Lee SC
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Jun; 20(6):1817-1824. PubMed ID: 31244305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding Patients' Experiences of Diagnosis and Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer in a Safety-Net Hospital System: A Qualitative Study.
    Leal IM; Kao LS; Karanjawala B; Escamilla RJ; Ko TC; Millas SG
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Apr; 61(4):504-513. PubMed ID: 29521833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do people with a different goal-orientation or specific focus make different decisions about colorectal cancer-screening participation?
    Douma LN; Uiters E; Timmermans DRM
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0213003. PubMed ID: 30817788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Autonomous and informed decision-making: The case of colorectal cancer screening.
    Douma LN; Uiters E; Verweij MF; Timmermans DRM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233308. PubMed ID: 32469889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Colorectal cancer screening: Associations between information provision, attitudes and intended participation.
    Brandhof SD; Fagerlin A; Hawley S; Toes-Zoutendijk E; Trevena L; McCaffery K; Korfage IJ
    Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Mar; 101(3):546-550. PubMed ID: 28899711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing participation in colorectal cancer screening-a qualitative study in an ethnic and socio-economically diverse inner city population.
    Dharni N; Armstrong D; Chung-Faye G; Wright AJ
    Health Expect; 2017 Aug; 20(4):608-617. PubMed ID: 27550367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.