These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26354041)

  • 41. In Vitro Effect of Mastication on the Retention and Wear of Locator Attachments in a Flat Mandibular Ridge Model.
    Tehini G; Baba NZ; Majzoub Z; Nahas P; Berberi A; Rifai K
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e744-e751. PubMed ID: 29968276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W; Kousvelari E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 9109267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. In Vitro Cyclic Dislodging Test on Retentive Force of Two Types of Female Parts of SFI-Bar.
    Wei L; Ma Q; Qin X; Pan S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):293-5. PubMed ID: 27148994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of denture cleansing solutions on different retentive attachments.
    Kürkcüoğlu I; Özkir SE; Köroğlu A; Sahin O; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 May; 115(5):606-10. PubMed ID: 26775247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Locator retention: does variation in number and configuration matter?
    Cayouette MJ; Barnes L; McPherson K; Wright GJ
    Gen Dent; 2017; 65(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 28068264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparative study of four retentive anchor systems for implant supported overdentures--retention force changes.
    Bayer S; Steinheuser D; Grüner M; Keilig L; Enkling N; Stark H; Mues S
    Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 19371390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [The measurement of retentive forces in mandibular complete overdenture with Magfit magnetic attachments].
    Du L; Xu C; Chao Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 21(5):366-8. PubMed ID: 14650991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of Simulated Mastication on the Retention of Locator Attachments for Implant-Supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Pilot Study.
    Tehini G; Baba NZ; Berberi A; Majzoub Z; Bassal H; Rifai K
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jan; 29(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28913855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Retentive characteristics of a vinylpolysiloxane overdenture attachment system.
    Schweyen R; Beuer F; Arnold C; Hey J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 May; 19(4):947-53. PubMed ID: 25146180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures - validation of an original force measurement system.
    Fromentin O; Lassauzay C; Abi Nader S; Feine J; de Albuquerque Junior RF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19912482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of Excessive Implant Angulation on Retention of Two Types of Overdenture Attachments during Cyclic Loading.
    Teimoori H; Shayegh SS; Zavaree MA; Hakimaneh SM; Khodadad F; Shidfar S; Baghani MT
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Oct; 19(10):1221-1227. PubMed ID: 30498177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Retention Force and Wear Characteristics of three Attachment Systems after Dislodging Cycles.
    Marin DOM; Leite ARP; Oliveira Junior NM; Paleari AG; Pero AC; Compagnoni MA
    Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(6):576-582. PubMed ID: 30517481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Influence of matrix attachment installation load on movement and resultant forces in implant overdentures.
    Goto T; Nagao K; Ishida Y; Tomotake Y; Ichikawa T
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Feb; 24(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 24975368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. An in vitro comparative study to evaluate the retention of different attachment systems used in implant-retained overdentures.
    Shastry T; Anupama NM; Shetty S; Nalinakshamma M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 27141166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of implant angulation on attachment retention in mandibular two-implant overdentures: a clinical study.
    Jabbour Z; Fromentin O; Lassauzay C; Abi Nader S; Correa JA; Feine J; de Albuquerque Junior RF
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):565-71. PubMed ID: 23305358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
    Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of stable retentive properties of overdenture attachments.
    Rutkunas V; Mizutani H; Takahashi H
    Stomatologija; 2005; 7(4):115-20. PubMed ID: 16501313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Wear simulation effects on overdenture stud attachments.
    Rutkunas V; Mizutani H; Takahashi H; Iwasaki N
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(6):845-53. PubMed ID: 22123008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.