222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26354177)
1. Letter to the editor: do complication rates differ by gender after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A systematic review.
Amstutz H; Le Duff M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3981-2. PubMed ID: 26354177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reply to letter to the editor: do complication rates differ by gender after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A systematic review.
Haughom BD; Erickson BJ; Hellman MD; Jacobs JJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3983-4. PubMed ID: 26400250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Do Complication Rates Differ by Gender After Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.
Haughom BD; Erickson BJ; Hellman MD; Jacobs JJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 473(8):2521-9. PubMed ID: 25758375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
Leopold SS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):300-303. PubMed ID: 27844400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Letter to the Editor regarding 'How symmetric are metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients during gait? Insights for the rehabilitation'.
Wiik AV; Logishetty K; Boughton O; Aqil A; Cobb JP
J Biomech; 2017 Oct; 63():203. PubMed ID: 28859859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. CORR Insights(®): No Difference in Reoperations at 2 Years Between Ceramic-on-metal and Metal-on-metal THA: A Randomized Trial.
Collier JP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):456-8. PubMed ID: 26290340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Response to Letter to the Editor concerning "How symmetric are metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients during gait? Insights for the rehabilitation".
Resende RA; Kirkwood RN; Rudan JF; Deluzio KJ
J Biomech; 2017 Oct; 63():204-205. PubMed ID: 28844724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. CORR Insights(®): do patients with a failed metal-on-metal hip implant with a pseudotumor present differences in their peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations?
Hallab NJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3915-7. PubMed ID: 26463565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. CORR Insights(®): What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
Nich C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3465-7. PubMed ID: 25791447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoperative Complications and Mid-Term Follow-Up of Large-Diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
Miettinen SSA; Mäkinen TJ; Mäkelä K; Huhtala H; Kettunen JS; Remes V
Scand J Surg; 2018 Jun; 107(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 29333941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CORR Insights(®): Early Lessons From a Worldwide, Multicenter, Followup Study of the Recalled Articular Surface Replacement Hip System.
Argenson JN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):175-7. PubMed ID: 26349441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing the failure rate of hip resurfacing in dysplasia patients: a retrospective analysis of 363 cases.
Gaillard MD; Gross TP
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun; 17():251. PubMed ID: 27267594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross sectional imaging of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties.
Wellenberg RH; Ettema HB; Verheyen CC; Maas M; Boomsma MF
Acta Orthop; 2015 Apr; 86(2):272-3. PubMed ID: 25708293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. PET/CT to detect adverse reactions to metal debris in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: an exploratory prospective study.
Aro E; Seppänen M; Mäkelä KT; Luoto P; Roivainen A; Aro HT
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 Sep; 38(5):847-855. PubMed ID: 29280283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Letter to the editor: the 2013 Frank Stinchfield award: diagnosis of infection in the early postoperative period after total hip arthroplasty.
Alshameeri Z; Khanduja V
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2150-1. PubMed ID: 25791443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reply to the letter to the editor: the 2013 Frank Stinchfield award: diagnosis of infection in the early postoperative period after total hip arthroplasty.
Yi PH; Cross MB; Della Valle CJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2152-3. PubMed ID: 25791444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross sectional imaging of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. Author reply.
Robinson E; Henckel J; Sabah S; Satchithananda K; Skinner J; Hart A
Acta Orthop; 2015 Apr; 86(2):273. PubMed ID: 25973469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Migaud H; Putman S; Kern G; Isida R; Girard J; Ramdane N; Delaunay CP; Hamadouche M;
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2190-9. PubMed ID: 27255729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
