These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26354671)

  • 1. Within-subject consistency and between-subject variability in Bayesian reasoning strategies.
    Cohen AL; Staub A
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Sep; 81():26-47. PubMed ID: 26354671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beliefs and Bayesian reasoning.
    Cohen AL; Sidlowski S; Staub A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):972-978. PubMed ID: 27604495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the generality and cognitive basis of base-rate neglect.
    Stengård E; Juslin P; Hahn U; van den Berg R
    Cognition; 2022 Sep; 226():105160. PubMed ID: 35660344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When does information about causal structure improve statistical reasoning?
    McNair S; Feeney A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):625-45. PubMed ID: 23931633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seeing the conflict: an attentional account of reasoning errors.
    Mata A; Ferreira MB; Voss A; Kollei T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1980-1986. PubMed ID: 28138834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adding up to good Bayesian reasoning: Problem format manipulations and individual skill differences.
    Brase GL; Hill WT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Apr; 146(4):577-591. PubMed ID: 28383994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Causal explanation improves judgment under uncertainty, but rarely in a Bayesian way.
    Hayes BK; Ngo J; Hawkins GE; Newell BR
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jan; 46(1):112-131. PubMed ID: 28905276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When intuitive Bayesians need to be good readers: The problem-wording effect on Bayesian reasoning.
    Sirota M; Navarrete G; Juanchich M
    Cognition; 2024 Apr; 245():105722. PubMed ID: 38309041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Bayesian perspective on constructing a written assessment of probabilistic clinical reasoning in experienced clinicians.
    Kreiter CD
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):44-48. PubMed ID: 26486941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probability theory, not the very guide of life.
    Juslin P; Nilsson H; Winman A
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):856-74. PubMed ID: 19839686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems.
    Evans JS; Handley SJ; Perham N; Over DE; Thompson VA
    Cognition; 2000 Dec; 77(3):197-213. PubMed ID: 11018509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Source reliability and the conjunction fallacy.
    Jarvstad A; Hahn U
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(4):682-711. PubMed ID: 21564268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deductive updating is not Bayesian.
    Markovits H; Brisson J; de Chantal PL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):949-56. PubMed ID: 25603167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interactivity fosters Bayesian reasoning without instruction.
    Vallée-Tourangeau G; Abadie M; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Jun; 144(3):581-603. PubMed ID: 26030173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian Brains without Probabilities.
    Sanborn AN; Chater N
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Dec; 20(12):883-893. PubMed ID: 28327290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
    Hahn U; Oaksford M
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partition-edit-count: naive extensional reasoning in judgment of conditional probability.
    Fox CR; Levav J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Dec; 133(4):626-42. PubMed ID: 15584810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying expectations about the strength of causal relationships.
    Yeung S; Griffiths TL
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Feb; 76():1-29. PubMed ID: 25522277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eye movements and problem solving: guiding attention guides thought.
    Grant ER; Spivey MJ
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Sep; 14(5):462-6. PubMed ID: 12930477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Focusing on what matters: Restructuring the presentation of Bayesian reasoning problems.
    Talboy AN; Schneider SL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Dec; 24(4):440-458. PubMed ID: 30299128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.