These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26354708)

  • 1. Adverse outcome pathway: Framework, application, and challenges in chemical risk assessment.
    Zhou B
    J Environ Sci (China); 2015 Sep; 35():191-193. PubMed ID: 26354708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New challenges in ecological risk assessment. Foreword.
    Vighi M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e1-3. PubMed ID: 23572334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 6TH NORWEGIAN ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY SYMPOSIUM: Assessing and solving environmental challenges in a multiple stressor world.
    Tollefsen KE; Kacew S
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2017; 80(16-18):805-806. PubMed ID: 28829685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical Approaches for Assessing Health Effects of Environmental Chemical Mixtures in Epidemiology: Lessons from an Innovative Workshop.
    Taylor KW; Joubert BR; Braun JM; Dilworth C; Gennings C; Hauser R; Heindel JJ; Rider CV; Webster TF; Carlin DJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 2016 Dec; 124(12):A227-A229. PubMed ID: 27905274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ecetoc approach to targeted environmental risk assessment.
    Feijtel T; Boeije G; Comber M; de Wolf W; Holt M; Koch V; Lecloux A; Siebel-Sauer A
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2005 Feb; 24(2):251-2. PubMed ID: 15719982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Challenges for exposure prediction in ecological risk assessment.
    Di Guardo A; Hermens JL
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e4-14. PubMed ID: 23610044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific issues in the U.S. EPA Framework for Metals Risk Assessment.
    Bradham K; Wentsel R
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2010; 73(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 20077282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ecological models in ecotoxicology and ecological risk assessment: an introduction to the special section.
    Galic N; Forbes V
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Jul; 33(7):1446-8. PubMed ID: 24939604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Veterinary medicines and the environment.
    Boxall A; Long C
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2005 Apr; 24(4):759-60. PubMed ID: 15839546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of new scientific developments in regulatory risk assessments: challenges and opportunities.
    Tarazona JV
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e85-91. PubMed ID: 23625625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is the integration of hormesis and essentiality into ecotoxicology now opening Pandora's Box?
    Kefford BJ; Zalizniak L; Warne MS; Nugegoda D
    Environ Pollut; 2008 Feb; 151(3):516-23. PubMed ID: 17559995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An approach for assessing human exposures to chemical mixtures in the environment.
    Rice G; MacDonell M; Hertzberg RC; Teuschler L; Picel K; Butler J; Chang YS; Hartmann H
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 233(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 18589469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uses of NHANES Biomarker Data for Chemical Risk Assessment: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities.
    Sobus JR; DeWoskin RS; Tan YM; Pleil JD; Phillips MB; George BJ; Christensen K; Schreinemachers DM; Williams MA; Hubal EA; Edwards SW
    Environ Health Perspect; 2015 Oct; 123(10):919-27. PubMed ID: 25859901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental exposure assessment of engineered nanoparticles: why REACH needs adjustment.
    Meesters JA; Veltman K; Hendriks AJ; van de Meent D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e15-26. PubMed ID: 23633247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Search for identification, monitoring and regulation of environmental pollutants.
    Murthy PB
    J Environ Biol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):6 p preceding table of contents. PubMed ID: 18831324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Matthew Effect and widely prescribed pharmaceuticals lacking environmental monitoring: case study of an exposure-assessment vulnerability.
    Daughton CG
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jan; 466-467():315-25. PubMed ID: 23911922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The increasing significance of biomonitoring for pesticides and organic pollutants.
    Tsatsakis AM; Christakis-Hampsas M; Liesivuori J
    Toxicol Lett; 2012 Apr; 210(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 22306370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Introduction to opening issue on Geo-spatial Analysis and Health/Exposure Relationships.
    Meliker JR; Rushton G
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2009; 1(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22749411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatially explicit method for ecotoxicological risk assessment of pesticides for birds.
    Sala S; Cavalli M; Vighi M
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Mar; 73(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 20074804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Progress in the application of exposomics in risk assessment of environmental chemicals].
    Wang ZW; Chen W
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jul; 54(7):798-803. PubMed ID: 32842306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.