These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26355440)

  • 1. Adhesive Cementation of Indirect Composite Inlays and Onlays: A Literature Review.
    D'Arcangelo C; Vanini L; Casinelli M; Frascaria M; De Angelis F; Vadini M; D'Amario M
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Sep; 36(8):570-7; quiz 578. PubMed ID: 26355440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adhesive cementation of chairside CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Blatz MB; Ripps A; Sadan A; Holst S
    Dent Today; 2006 Jan; 25(1):60, 62-5; quiz 65. PubMed ID: 16471400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Materials and techniques for achieving clinical excellence with indirect composite restorations.
    Brucia JJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 2001 Jan; 45(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 11210701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indirect posterior restorations using a new chairside microhybrid resin composite system.
    Tay FR; Wei SH
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 11317389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of three variables on shear bond strength when luting a resin inlay to dentin.
    Lee JI; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 19544817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of oxalate desensitizer with different resin cement-retained indirect composite inlays on fracture resistance of teeth.
    Shafiei F; Alavi AA; Karimi F; Ansarifard E
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 23279061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface treatment protocols in the cementation process of ceramic and laboratory-processed composite restorations: a literature review.
    Soares CJ; Soares PV; Pereira JC; Fonseca RB
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(4):224-35. PubMed ID: 16231493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impairment of resin cement application on the bond strength of indirect composite restorations.
    Skupien JA; Porto JA; Münchow EA; Cenci MS; Pereira-Cenci T
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26039908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictable cementation of esthetic restorations: part II--selection criteria and guidelines for implementation.
    Quintas AF
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 19(9):7-9. PubMed ID: 18038716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography.
    Türk AG; Sabuncu M; Ünal S; Önal B; Ulusoy M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 27556210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study.
    Taschner M; Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Pelka M; Breschi L; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 22236770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptability and microleakage of indirect resin inlays: an in vivo investigation.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):861-5. PubMed ID: 20830881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of light-activated and auto- and dual-polymerizing adhesive systems on bond strength of indirect composite resin to dentin.
    de Menezes MJ; Arrais CA; Giannini M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 16911888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical considerations for aesthetic laboratory-fabricated inlay/onlay restorations: a review.
    Terry DA; Touati B
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001; 13(1):51-8; quiz 60. PubMed ID: 11301531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developing form, function, and natural aesthetics with laboratory-processed composite resin--part II.
    Terry DA; Leinfelder KF; Maragos C
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 17(7):449-54; quiz 456. PubMed ID: 18655333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Esthetic inlays and onlays.
    Jackson RD
    Curr Opin Cosmet Dent; 1994; ():30-9. PubMed ID: 8032438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.