These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2635572)

  • 1. [Measurement of orthodontic appliance force using prototype sensors].
    Slaj M; Goja Z; Lapter V
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 1989; 23(2):95-107. PubMed ID: 2635572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biomechanical analysis of deformation and strain on lower jaw model.
    Keros J; Bagić I; Verzak Z; Buković D; Lulić-Dukić O
    Coll Antropol; 1998 Jun; 22(1):195-201. PubMed ID: 10097436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro testing of a measuring system for in vivo recording of orthodontically applied forces and moments in the multiband technique. Part II.
    Friedrich D; Rosarius N; Schwindke P; Rau G; Diedrich P
    J Orofac Orthop; 1998; 59(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 9577103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Design and testing of a novel measuring system for use in dental biomechanics--principles and examples of measurements with the hexapod measuring system].
    Keilig L; Bourauel C; Grüner M; Hültenschmidt R; Bayer S; Utz KH; Stark H
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 Aug; 49(7-8):208-15. PubMed ID: 15481409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of a model for the simulation of orthodontic load on lower first premolars using the finite element method.
    Dorow C; Sander FG
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 May; 66(3):208-18. PubMed ID: 15959634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calibration of T-Scan sensors for recording bite forces in denture patients.
    Throckmorton GS; Rasmussen J; Caloss R
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Sep; 36(9):636-43. PubMed ID: 19602099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Establishment of the micro-stress sensor measurement system for invisible aligner technique].
    Ren CC; Bai YX; Wang ZY; Zhang M
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):600-3. PubMed ID: 22321629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the initial orthodontic force systems produced by a new lingual bracket system and a straight-wire appliance.
    Fuck LM; Wiechmann D; Drescher D
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Sep; 66(5):363-76. PubMed ID: 16231112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring system for in vivo recording of force systems in orthodontic treatment-concept and analysis of accuracy.
    Friedrich D; Rosarius N; Rau G; Diedrich P
    J Biomech; 1999 Jan; 32(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 10050954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraoral aging of orthodontic materials: the picture we miss and its clinical relevance.
    Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 15821684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of non-linear finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on a Morse taper implant.
    Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K; Cehreli MC; Sahin S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 12705305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complete orthodontic load systems on teeth in a continuous full archwire: the role of triangular loop position.
    Chen J; Bulucea I; Katona TR; Ofner S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):143.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17693357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fibre optic Bragg grating sensors: an alternative method to strain gauges for measuring deformation in bone.
    Fresvig T; Ludvigsen P; Steen H; Reikerås O
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Jan; 30(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 17369073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vitro comparison of 4 brands of nonlatex orthodontic elastics.
    Kersey ML; Glover K; Heo G; Raboud D; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 12695767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of time and clear aligner removal frequency on the force delivered by different polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified materials determined with thin-film pressure sensors.
    Skaik A; Wei XL; Abusamak I; Iddi I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jan; 155(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 30591174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The biomechanics of rapid maxillary sutural expansion.
    Braun S; Bottrel JA; Lee KG; Lunazzi JJ; Legan HL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 10982925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental care with manual toothbrushes during fixed orthodontic treatment--a new testing procedure.
    Sander FM; Sander C; Sander FG
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Jul; 66(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 16044228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Study appliance for measuring the effect on the dental arch of fixed orthodontic treatment appliances].
    Schienbein H
    Quintessenz; 1970 Oct; 21(10):107-12. PubMed ID: 5275308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro assessment of the mechanical properties of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics.
    Russell KA; Milne AD; Khanna RA; Lee JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 11455375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical properties of root cementum: Part 10. Comparison of the effects of invisible removable thermoplastic appliances with light and heavy orthodontic forces on premolar cementum. A microcomputed-tomography study.
    Barbagallo LJ; Jones AS; Petocz P; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 18249288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.