172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26355983)
1. Application of a Novel Semi-Automatic Technique for Determining the Bilateral Symmetry Plane of the Facial Skeleton of Normal Adult Males.
Roumeliotis G; Willing R; Neuert M; Ahluwalia R; Jenkyn T; Yazdani A
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):1997-2001. PubMed ID: 26355983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and evaluation of a semi-automatic technique for determining the bilateral symmetry plane of the facial skeleton.
Willing RT; Roumeliotis G; Jenkyn TR; Yazdani A
Med Eng Phys; 2013 Dec; 35(12):1843-9. PubMed ID: 23891670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; De Wit M; Ren Y
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):285-94. PubMed ID: 21271348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Three-dimensional Analysis of Zygomatic Symmetry in Normal, Uninjured Faces.
Belcastro A; Willing R; Jenkyn T; Johnson M; Galil K; Yazdani A
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):504-8. PubMed ID: 26967083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A geometric morphometric validation study of computed tomography-extracted craniofacial landmarks.
Hale AR; Honeycutt KK; Ross AH
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):231-7. PubMed ID: 24406584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic extraction of the mid-facial plane for cranio-maxillofacial surgery planning.
De Momi E; Chapuis J; Pappas I; Ferrigno G; Hallermann W; Schramm A; Caversaccio M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 35(7):636-42. PubMed ID: 16542822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitation of zygomatic complex symmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Gong X; He Y; He Y; An JG; Yang Y; Zhang Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):2053.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25234538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Standardization of 3-D CT measurements for length and angles by matrix transformation in the 3-D coordinate system.
Kitaura H; Yonetsu K; Kitamori H; Kobayashi K; Nakamura T
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Jul; 37(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 10912713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic localization of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images by extracting symmetry features of the skull.
Neelapu BC; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Gupta A; Vasamsetti S; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Feb; 47(2):20170054. PubMed ID: 28845693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new method for automatic tracking of facial landmarks in 3D motion captured images (4D).
Al-Anezi T; Khambay B; Peng MJ; O'Leary E; Ju X; Ayoub A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 23218511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the reliability and repeatability of landmarks using 3-D cephalometric software.
Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco AA; Crincoli V; Debernardi CL; Bracco P
Cranio; 2012 Oct; 30(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23156966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A simple and accurate craniofacial midsagittal plane definition.
Green MN; Bloom JM; Kulbersh R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):355-363. PubMed ID: 28863916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional McNamara Cephalometric Analysis.
Santos RMGD; De Martino JM; Haiter Neto F; Passeri LA
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 29(4):895-899. PubMed ID: 29381618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of adolescents with cleft lip and palate using computed tomography-guided imaging.
Zhao ZM; Zhu Y; Huo R; Su JR; Gao F
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):1939-42. PubMed ID: 25329850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Location of facial foramina and mandibular angle from cone beam computed tomographic scans.
Özgüner G; Yildirim D; Koyuncu E; Sulak O; Er SE
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):268-73. PubMed ID: 25490577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Construction and validation of the midsagittal reference plane based on the skull base symmetry for three-dimensional cephalometric craniofacial analysis.
Kim HJ; Kim BC; Kim JG; Zhengguo P; Kang SH; Lee SH
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 25(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 24469365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional analysis system for orthognathic surgery patients with jaw deformities.
Terajima M; Yanagita N; Ozeki K; Hoshino Y; Mori N; Goto TK; Tokumori K; Aoki Y; Nakasima A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 18617109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison Between Interactive Closest Point and Procrustes Analysis for Determining the Median Sagittal Plane of Three-Dimensional Facial Data.
Xiong Y; Zhao Y; Yang H; Sun Y; Wang Y
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):441-4. PubMed ID: 26825747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional cephalometry: a method for the identification and for the orientation of the skull after cone-bean computed tomographic scan.
Frongia G; Bracco P; Piancino MG
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):e308-11. PubMed ID: 23715002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
