These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26356928)
21. Studying Early Decision Making with Progressive Bar Charts. Patil A; Richer G; Jermaine C; Moritz D; Fekete JD IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2023 Jan; 29(1):407-417. PubMed ID: 36166544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Perceptual proxies for extracting averages in data visualizations. Yuan L; Haroz S; Franconeri S Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):669-676. PubMed ID: 30238296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of uncertainty visualizations on myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle in retirement investment decisions. Wesslen R; Karduni A; Markant D; Dou W IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2022 Jan; 28(1):454-464. PubMed ID: 34570703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Boxplots for grouped and clustered data in toxicology. Pallmann P; Hothorn LA Arch Toxicol; 2016 Jul; 90(7):1631-8. PubMed ID: 26438403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Blinded with Science or Informed by Charts? A Replication Study. Dragicevic P; Jansen Y IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2018 Jan; 24(1):781-790. PubMed ID: 28866535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A note on error bars as a graphical representation of the variability of data in biomedical research: Choosing between standard deviation and standard error of the mean. Tang L; Zhang H; Zhang B J Pancreatol; 2019 Sep; 2(3):69-71. PubMed ID: 34012702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Constructing Visual Representations: Investigating the Use of Tangible Tokens. Huron S; Jansen Y; Carpendale S IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2014 Dec; 20(12):2102-11. PubMed ID: 26356924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Replacing bar graphs of continuous data with more informative graphics: are we making progress? Riedel N; Schulz R; Kazezian V; Weissgerber T Clin Sci (Lond); 2022 Aug; 136(15):1139-1156. PubMed ID: 35822444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An evaluation of Cochrane Crowd found that crowdsourcing produced accurate results in identifying randomized trials. Noel-Storr A; Dooley G; Elliott J; Steele E; Shemilt I; Mavergames C; Wisniewski S; McDonald S; Murano M; Glanville J; Foxlee R; Beecher D; Ware J; Thomas J J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():130-139. PubMed ID: 33476769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Smile or Scowl? Looking at Infographic Design Through the Affective Lens. Lan X; Shi Y; Zhang Y; Cao N IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2021 Jun; 27(6):2796-2807. PubMed ID: 33877979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Sense of Confidence during Probabilistic Learning: A Normative Account. Meyniel F; Schlunegger D; Dehaene S PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 11(6):e1004305. PubMed ID: 26076466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bar graphs depicting averages are perceptually misinterpreted: the within-the-bar bias. Newman GE; Scholl BJ Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 22648655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparing 2D vector field visualization methods: a user study. Laidlaw DH; Kirby RM; Jackson CD; Davidson JS; Miller TS; da Silva M; Warren WH; Tarr MJ IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2005; 11(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 15631129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Task-Based Taxonomy of Cognitive Biases for Information Visualization. Dimara E; Franconeri S; Plaisant C; Bezerianos A; Dragicevic P IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2020 Feb; 26(2):1413-1432. PubMed ID: 30281459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A tutorial on capturing mental representations through drawing and crowd-sourced scoring. Bainbridge WA Behav Res Methods; 2022 Apr; 54(2):663-675. PubMed ID: 34341961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Crowdsourcing image annotation for nucleus detection and segmentation in computational pathology: evaluating experts, automated methods, and the crowd. Irshad H; Montaser-Kouhsari L; Waltz G; Bucur O; Nowak JA; Dong F; Knoblauch NW; Beck AH Pac Symp Biocomput; 2015; ():294-305. PubMed ID: 25592590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study. McCaffery KJ; Dixon A; Hayen A; Jansen J; Smith S; Simpson JM Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 22074912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]