These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26356929)

  • 1. Four Experiments on the Perception of Bar Charts.
    Talbot J; Setlur V; Anand A
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2014 Dec; 20(12):2152-60. PubMed ID: 26356929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Perceptual Proxies of Visual Comparison.
    Jardine N; Ondov BD; Elmqvist N; Franconeri S
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2020 Jan; 26(1):1012-1021. PubMed ID: 31443016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Error Bars Considered Harmful: Exploring Alternate Encodings for Mean and Error.
    Correll M; Gleicher M
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2014 Dec; 20(12):2142-51. PubMed ID: 26356928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Elementary graphical perception for older adults: a comparison with the general population.
    Le T; Aragon C; Thompson HJ; Demiris G
    Perception; 2014; 43(11):1249-60. PubMed ID: 25638940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Just noticeable differences in 2D and 3D bar charts: a psychophysical analysis of chart readability.
    Hughes BM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Apr; 92(2):495-503. PubMed ID: 11361313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The classification of graphical elements.
    Hollands JG
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2003 Mar; 57(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 12674368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Glanceable Visualization: Studies of Data Comparison Performance on Smartwatches.
    Blascheck T; Besancon L; Bezerianos A; Lee B; Isenberg P
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2018 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 30138911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Graphical Overlays: Using Layered Elements to Aid Chart Reading.
    Kong N; Agrawala M
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Dec; 18(12):2631-8. PubMed ID: 26357172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating 'Graphical Perception' with CNNs.
    Haehn D; Tompkin J; Pfister H
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2018 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 30136985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judgments of change and proportion in graphical perception.
    Hollands JG; Spence I
    Hum Factors; 1992 Jun; 34(3):313-34. PubMed ID: 1634243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling Just Noticeable Differences in Charts.
    Lu M; Lanir J; Wang C; Yao Y; Zhang W; Deussen O; Huang H
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2022 Jan; 28(1):718-726. PubMed ID: 34587088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study.
    McCaffery KJ; Dixon A; Hayen A; Jansen J; Smith S; Simpson JM
    Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 22074912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Studying Early Decision Making with Progressive Bar Charts.
    Patil A; Richer G; Jermaine C; Moritz D; Fekete JD
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2023 Jan; 29(1):407-417. PubMed ID: 36166544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Common angle plots as perception-true visualizations of categorical associations.
    Hofmann H; Vendettuoli M
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2013 Dec; 19(12):2297-305. PubMed ID: 24051796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Risks of Ranking: Revisiting Graphical Perception to Model Individual Differences in Visualization Performance.
    Davis R; Pu X; Ding Y; Hall BD; Bonilla K; Feng M; Kay M; Harrison L
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2024 Mar; 30(3):1756-1771. PubMed ID: 37015487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk predictions for individual patients from logistic regression were visualized with bar-line charts.
    Björk J; Ekelund U; Ohlsson M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Mar; 65(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 22112994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the Effect of Visualizations on Bayesian Reasoning through Crowdsourcing.
    Micallef L; Dragicevic P; Fekete J
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Dec; 18(12):2536-45. PubMed ID: 26357162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The perceptual scalability of visualization.
    Yost B; North C
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2006; 12(5):837-44. PubMed ID: 17080807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual proxies for extracting averages in data visualizations.
    Yuan L; Haroz S; Franconeri S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):669-676. PubMed ID: 30238296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Open vs. Closed Shapes: New Perceptual Categories?
    Burlinson D; Subramanian K; Goolkasian P
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2018 Jan; 24(1):574-583. PubMed ID: 28866568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.