These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26358471)

  • 1. Visibility of speech articulation enhances auditory phonetic convergence.
    Dias JW; Rosenblum LD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):317-33. PubMed ID: 26358471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phonetic convergence across multiple measures and model talkers.
    Pardo JS; Urmanche A; Wilman S; Wiener J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):637-659. PubMed ID: 27826946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction.
    Pardo JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2382-93. PubMed ID: 16642851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
    Shahin AJ; Backer KC; Rosenblum LD; Kerlin JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conversational role influences speech imitation.
    Pardo JS; Jay IC; Krauss RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2254-64. PubMed ID: 21097867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional resources contribute to the perceptual learning of talker idiosyncrasies in audiovisual speech.
    Jesse A; Kaplan E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1006-1019. PubMed ID: 30684204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selecting among competing models of talker adaptation: Attention, cognition, and memory in speech processing efficiency.
    Kapadia AM; Perrachione TK
    Cognition; 2020 Nov; 204():104393. PubMed ID: 32688132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus Sensitivity to Phonetic Competition in Receptive Language Processing: A Comparison of Clear and Conversational Speech.
    Xie X; Myers E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 30(3):267-280. PubMed ID: 29160743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children.
    Hazan V; Markham D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3108-18. PubMed ID: 15603156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-modal phonetic encoding facilitates the McGurk illusion and phonemic restoration.
    Abbott NT; Shahin AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Dec; 120(6):2988-3000. PubMed ID: 30303762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some consequences of stimulus variability on speech processing by 2-month-old infants.
    Jusczyk PW; Pisoni DB; Mullennix J
    Cognition; 1992 Jun; 43(3):253-91. PubMed ID: 1643815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-modal transfer of talker-identity learning.
    Simmons D; Dorsi J; Dias JW; Rosenblum LD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):415-434. PubMed ID: 33083986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models.
    Callan DE; Jones JA; Callan AM; Akahane-Yamada R
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1182-94. PubMed ID: 15219590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic-phonetic and auditory mechanisms of adaptation in the perception of sibilant fricatives.
    Chodroff E; Wilson C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2027-2048. PubMed ID: 31875314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Seeing facial motion affects auditory processing in noise.
    Gilbert JL; Lansing CR; Garnsey SM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1761-81. PubMed ID: 23070884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of invisible lip movements on phonetic perception.
    Teramoto W; Ernst MO
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6478. PubMed ID: 37081084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How much imitation is there in a shadowing task?
    Dufour S; Nguyen N
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():346. PubMed ID: 23801974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing Phonetic Convergence in Children and Adults.
    Paquette-Smith M; Schertz J; Johnson EK
    Lang Speech; 2022 Mar; 65(1):240-260. PubMed ID: 33998342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lexically guided retuning of visual phonetic categories.
    van der Zande P; Jesse A; Cutler A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):562-71. PubMed ID: 23862831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.