These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Enhanced discrimination between flavor stimuli: roles of salience modulation and inhibition. Artigas AA; Sansa J; Blair CA; Hall G; Prados J J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Apr; 32(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 16634660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential effect of the intermixed and blocked preexposure schedules on the strength of within-compound associations. Rodríguez G; Alonso G J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 25545980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptual learning in flavor aversion: evidence for learned changes in stimulus effectiveness. Blair CA; Hall G J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jan; 29(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 12561132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stimulus preexposure, comparison, and changes in the associability of common stimulus features. Symonds M; Hall G Q J Exp Psychol B; 1997 Nov; 50(4):317-31. PubMed ID: 9421977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of comparison between similar stimuli on the effectiveness of their unique features. Lombas AS; Alonso G; Rodríguez G Behav Processes; 2008 May; 78(1):112-6. PubMed ID: 18242877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of extended training on generalization of latent inhibition: an instance of perceptual learning. Rodríguez G; Alonso G Learn Behav; 2011 Mar; 39(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21298379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the perceptual learning effect in flavour aversion learning: evidence for stimulus differentiation. Mondragón E; Hall G Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Apr; 55(2):153-69. PubMed ID: 12075981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Within-subjects assessment of the within-compound associations resulting from intermixed and blocked preexposure schedules. Rodríguez G; Alonso G Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 25413607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison and contrast as a mechanism of perceptual learning? Bennett CH; Mackintosh NJ Q J Exp Psychol B; 1999 Aug; 52(3):253-72. PubMed ID: 10467899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stimulus comparison in perceptual learning: roles of sensory preconditioning and latent inhibition. Rodríguez G; Alonso G Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):400-4. PubMed ID: 17728074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Blocked and test-stimulus exposure effects in perceptual learning re-examined. Sanjuan Mdel C; Alonso G; Nelson JB Behav Processes; 2004 Apr; 66(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 15062968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Salience modulation and associative inhibition interaction: short but not long exposure to similar stimuli protects the salience of the unique elements. Contel DM; Sansa J; Artigas AA; Prados J Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 20804832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The US-preexposure effect in lithium-induced flavor-aversion conditioning is a consequence of blocking by injection cues. de Brugada I; Hall G; Symonds M J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Jan; 30(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 14709115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptual learning transfer in an appetitive Pavlovian task. Artigas AA; Prados J Learn Behav; 2017 Jun; 45(2):115-123. PubMed ID: 27495931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Espinet and the perceptual learning effects in flavour aversion conditioning: do they depend on a common inhibitory mechanism? Artigas AA; Sansa J; Prados J Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Mar; 59(3):471-81. PubMed ID: 16627350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in stimulus salience as a result of stimulus preexposure: evidence from aversive and appetitive testing procedures. Blair CA; Hall G Learn Behav; 2003 May; 31(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 12882377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]