343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26359151)
1. Impact of Software Modeling on the Accuracy of Perfusion MRI in Glioma.
Hu LS; Kelm Z; Korfiatis P; Dueck AC; Elrod C; Ellingson BM; Kaufmann TJ; Eschbacher JM; Karis JP; Smith K; Nakaji P; Brinkman D; Pafundi D; Baxter LC; Erickson BJ
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2015 Dec; 36(12):2242-9. PubMed ID: 26359151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of Standardized Relative CBV for Quantifying Regional Histologic Tumor Burden in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: Comparison against Normalized Relative CBV Using Image-Localized Stereotactic Biopsies.
Hoxworth JM; Eschbacher JM; Gonzales AC; Singleton KW; Leon GD; Smith KA; Stokes AM; Zhou Y; Mazza GL; Porter AB; Mrugala MM; Zimmerman RS; Bendok BR; Patra DP; Krishna C; Boxerman JL; Baxter LC; Swanson KR; Quarles CC; Schmainda KM; Hu LS
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2020 Mar; 41(3):408-415. PubMed ID: 32165359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of MRI Protocol Parameters, Preload Injection Dose, Fractionation Strategies, and Leakage Correction Algorithms on the Fidelity of Dynamic-Susceptibility Contrast MRI Estimates of Relative Cerebral Blood Volume in Gliomas.
Leu K; Boxerman JL; Ellingson BM
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Mar; 38(3):478-484. PubMed ID: 28034995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimized preload leakage-correction methods to improve the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging in posttreatment gliomas.
Hu LS; Baxter LC; Pinnaduwage DS; Paine TL; Karis JP; Feuerstein BG; Schmainda KM; Dueck AC; Debbins J; Smith KA; Nakaji P; Eschbacher JM; Coons SW; Heiserman JE
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2010 Jan; 31(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 19749223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative cerebral blood volume values to differentiate high-grade glioma recurrence from posttreatment radiation effect: direct correlation between image-guided tissue histopathology and localized dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging measurements.
Hu LS; Baxter LC; Smith KA; Feuerstein BG; Karis JP; Eschbacher JM; Coons SW; Nakaji P; Yeh RF; Debbins J; Heiserman JE
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Mar; 30(3):552-8. PubMed ID: 19056837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of Percentage Signal Recovery and Baseline Signal in DSC-MRI Optimized for Relative CBV Measurement for Differentiating Glioblastoma, Lymphoma, Metastasis, and Meningioma.
Lee MD; Baird GL; Bell LC; Quarles CC; Boxerman JL
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1445-1450. PubMed ID: 31371360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved perfusion MR imaging assessment of intracerebral tumor blood volume and antiangiogenic therapy efficacy in a rat model with ferumoxytol.
Gahramanov S; Muldoon LL; Li X; Neuwelt EA
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):796-804. PubMed ID: 21940504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing perfusion metrics obtained from a single compartment versus pharmacokinetic modeling methods using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade.
Law M; Young R; Babb J; Rad M; Sasaki T; Zagzag D; Johnson G
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2006 Oct; 27(9):1975-82. PubMed ID: 17032878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic assessment of multi-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using a digital reference object.
Stokes AM; Semmineh NB; Nespodzany A; Bell LC; Quarles CC
Magn Reson Med; 2020 Jan; 83(1):109-123. PubMed ID: 31400035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of region-of-interest analysis with three different histogram analysis methods in the determination of perfusion metrics in patients with brain gliomas.
Young R; Babb J; Law M; Pollack E; Johnson G
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1053-63. PubMed ID: 17896374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in dynamic susceptibility contrast MR perfusion maps generated by different methods implemented in commercial software.
Orsingher L; Piccinini S; Crisi G
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):647-54. PubMed ID: 24879459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved Leakage Correction for Single-Echo Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion MRI Estimates of Relative Cerebral Blood Volume in High-Grade Gliomas by Accounting for Bidirectional Contrast Agent Exchange.
Leu K; Boxerman JL; Cloughesy TF; Lai A; Nghiemphu PL; Liau LM; Pope WB; Ellingson BM
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Aug; 37(8):1440-6. PubMed ID: 27079371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Permeability measurement using dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging enhances differential diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma.
Lee JY; Bjørnerud A; Park JE; Lee BE; Kim JH; Kim HS
Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5539-5548. PubMed ID: 30877463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assesment of perfusion in glial tumors with arterial spin labeling; comparison with dynamic susceptibility contrast method.
Cebeci H; Aydin O; Ozturk-Isik E; Gumus C; Inecikli F; Bekar A; Kocaeli H; Hakyemez B
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1914-9. PubMed ID: 25087109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Moving Toward a Consensus DSC-MRI Protocol: Validation of a Low-Flip Angle Single-Dose Option as a Reference Standard for Brain Tumors.
Schmainda KM; Prah MA; Hu LS; Quarles CC; Semmineh N; Rand SD; Connelly JM; Anderies B; Zhou Y; Liu Y; Logan B; Stokes A; Baird G; Boxerman JL
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2019 Apr; 40(4):626-633. PubMed ID: 30923088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between intensity normalization techniques for dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-MRI estimates of cerebral blood volume (CBV) in human gliomas.
Ellingson BM; Zaw T; Cloughesy TF; Naeini KM; Lalezari S; Mong S; Lai A; Nghiemphu PL; Pope WB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jun; 35(6):1472-7. PubMed ID: 22281731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance and correlation analysis using microvascular leakage, cerebral blood volume, and blood flow derived from 3T dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging in glial tumor grading.
Server A; Graff BA; Orheim TE; Schellhorn T; Josefsen R; Gadmar ØB; Nakstad PH
Neuroradiology; 2011 Jun; 53(6):435-47. PubMed ID: 20857284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Arterial Spin-Labeling and DSC Perfusion Metrics Improve Agreement in Neuroradiologists' Clinical Interpretations of Posttreatment High-Grade Glioma Surveillance MR Imaging-An Institutional Experience.
Yamin G; Tranvinh E; Lanzman BA; Tong E; Hashmi SS; Patel CB; Iv M
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2024 Apr; 45(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 38453410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of Tumor Immunohistochemistry with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and DSC-MRI Parameters in Patients with Gliomas.
Nguyen TB; Cron GO; Bezzina K; Perdrizet K; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Thornhill RE; Zanette B; Cameron IG
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Dec; 37(12):2217-2223. PubMed ID: 27585700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective comparative diagnostic accuracy evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) vs. dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion in differentiating tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated high-grade gliomas.
Zakhari N; Taccone MS; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Sinclair J; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Cron GO; Thornhill RE; McInnes MDF; Nguyen TB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):573-582. PubMed ID: 30614146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
