223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26359654)
1. An In Vivo Evaluation of the Fit of Zirconium-Oxide Based, Ceramic Single Crowns with Vertical and Horizontal Finish Line Preparations.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S; Biscaro L; Stellini E
J Prosthodont; 2015 Dec; 24(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 26359654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vivo evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide based ceramic single crowns, generated with two CAD/CAM systems, in comparison to metal ceramic single crowns.
Biscaro L; Bonfiglioli R; Soattin M; Vigolo P
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jan; 22(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22946875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide crowns in preparations with two different finish lines.
Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Brufau-de Barberà M; Gomes-Azevedo S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 22372886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of marginal fit of Lava CAD/CAM crown-copings with two finish lines.
Re D; Cerutti F; Augusti G; Cerutti A; Augusti D
Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 25126621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal and internal adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic copings and crowns with different finish line designs.
Komine F; Iwai T; Kobayashi K; Matsumura H
Dent Mater J; 2007 Sep; 26(5):659-64. PubMed ID: 18203465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G
Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of cervical finish line type on the marginal adaptation of zirconia ceramic crowns.
Comlekoglu M; Dundar M; Ozcan M; Gungor M; Gokce B; Artunc C
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 19830974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F
J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A micro-computed tomography analysis of internal and marginal fits of fixed partial dentures: Effect of preparation finish line designs on monolithic zirconia and heat-pressed zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate.
Elsherbini M; Sakrana AA; Amin RA; Diaa M; Özcan M; Al-Zordk W
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):90-99. PubMed ID: 36718906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of fabrication stages and cementation on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Yilmaz B; Seker E; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):736-741. PubMed ID: 28434679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of tooth preparations for zirconia-based crowns and fixed dental prostheses using stereolithography data sets.
Winkelmeyer C; Wolfart S; Marotti J
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Nov; 116(5):783-789. PubMed ID: 27236595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of CAD/CAM scanning method and tooth-preparation design on the vertical misfit of zirconia crown copings.
Castillo Oyagüe R; Sánchez-Jorge MI; Sánchez Turrión A
Am J Dent; 2010 Dec; 23(6):341-6. PubMed ID: 21344834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nondestructive, in vitro quantification of crown margins.
Mitchell CA; Pintado MR; Douglas WH
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):575-84. PubMed ID: 11404758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
